PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MO vs. LUNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MO vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Altria Group, Inc. (MO) and Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MO achieves a 33.62% return, which is significantly higher than LUNR's -14.79% return.


MO

1D
0.61%
1M
8.02%
6M
24.75%
YTD
33.62%
1Y
37.41%
3Y*
27.19%
5Y*
18.35%
10Y*
7.92%
ALL TIME*
18.00%

LUNR

1D
2.29%
1M
-39.47%
6M
-35.91%
YTD
-14.79%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MO vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
33.62%18.17%40.76%-3.70%4.37%8.66%
LUNR
Intuitive Machines, Inc.
-14.79%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%3.73%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MO and LUNR is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

-0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MO:

$124.67B

LUNR:

$2.20B

EPS

MO:

$4.80

LUNR:

-$0.00

PS Ratio

MO:

5.74

LUNR:

2.04K

Total Revenue (TTM)

MO:

$21.82B

LUNR:

$334.27M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MO:

$14.80B

LUNR:

$85.92M

EBITDA (TTM)

MO:

$11.70B

LUNR:

-$96.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MO vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MO
MO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MO vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altria Group, Inc. (MO) and Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOLUNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.11

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

0.16

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.75

0.42

+5.33

MO vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MO Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MO and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MO vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MO drawdown since its inception was -65.43%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MO and LUNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOLUNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.43%

-97.43%

+32.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-70.59%

+54.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.40%

-76.91%

+60.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-83.13%

+83.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.91%

-63.50%

+51.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.53%

27.37%

-20.84%

Volatility

MO vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Altria Group, Inc. (MO) is 7.16%, while Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 19.39%. This indicates that MO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOLUNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

19.39%

-12.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.14%

86.71%

-68.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.27%

112.31%

-89.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

169.91%

-149.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.09%

169.91%

-146.82%

Dividends

MO vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

MO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, while LUNR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUNR
Intuitive Machines, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
5.68%7.21%7.65%9.52%8.05%7.43%8.29%6.57%6.07%3.56%3.48%3.73%

Financials

MO vs. LUNR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Altria Group, Inc. and Intuitive Machines, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.43B
186.73M
(MO) Total Revenue
(LUNR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MO vs. LUNR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Altria Group, Inc. and Intuitive Machines, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
64.6%
39.0%
Portfolio components
MO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.51B and revenue of 5.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.

LUNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuitive Machines, Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.82M and revenue of 186.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

MO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.96B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.5%.

LUNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuitive Machines, Inc. reported an operating income of -39.20M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.

MO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.

LUNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuitive Machines, Inc. reported a net income of -37.55M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in a net margin of -20.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MO and LUNR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUNR has higher volatility (19.39%) compared to MO (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MO dropped -65.43% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

MO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MO and LUNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer