MO vs. KMLM
MO (Altria Group, Inc.) is a stock, while KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) is Systematic Trend fund tracking the KFA MLM Index. Over the past 5 years, MO returned 16.36%/yr vs 4.11%/yr for KMLM. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
MO vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MO achieves a 26.86% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's 8.32% return.
MO
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 26.86%
- 6M
- 26.78%
- 1Y
- 28.74%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
KMLM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 13.24%
- 3Y*
- -1.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.11%
- 10Y*
- —
MO vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 26.86% | 18.17% | 40.76% | -3.70% | 4.37% | 24.18% | 3.33% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 8.32% | -2.98% | -1.69% | -5.66% | 30.61% | 7.04% | 5.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between MO and KMLM is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MO vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
MO
KMLM
MO vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altria Group, Inc. (MO) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MO | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 1.78 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 5.86 | -1.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MO vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MO drawdown since its inception was -65.43%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MO and KMLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MO | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.43% | -27.47% | -37.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -6.83% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.40% | -22.28% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.83% | -27.47% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -15.54% | +12.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.92% | -12.74% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 2.10% | +4.40% |
Volatility
MO vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
Altria Group, Inc. (MO) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 3.35%. This indicates that MO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MO | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 3.35% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.60% | 9.77% | +7.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.59% | 11.50% | +11.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 14.62% | +6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 14.71% | +8.26% |
Dividends
MO vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
MO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than KMLM's 4.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.64% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 5.84% | 7.21% | 7.65% | 9.52% | 8.05% | 7.43% | 8.29% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 3.56% | 3.48% | 3.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MO and KMLM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MO has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to KMLM (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MO dropped -65.43% vs KMLM's -27.47%.
MO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MO and KMLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer