MO vs. IBOT
MO (Altria Group, Inc.) is a stock, while IBOT (VanEck Robotics ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar® Robotics Index. Over the past 3 years, MO returned 25.73%/yr vs 20.68%/yr for IBOT. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
MO vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MO achieves a 26.86% return, which is significantly higher than IBOT's 24.30% return.
MO
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 26.86%
- 6M
- 26.78%
- 1Y
- 28.74%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
IBOT
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 24.30%
- 6M
- 24.91%
- 1Y
- 50.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MO vs. IBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 26.86% | 18.17% | 40.76% | -2.99% |
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF | 24.30% | 28.57% | 6.39% | 19.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MO and IBOT is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2023 | -0.09 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MO and IBOT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.09 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MO vs. IBOT — Risk / Return Rank
MO
IBOT
MO vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altria Group, Inc. (MO) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MO | IBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 2.89 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 11.67 | -7.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MO vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MO drawdown since its inception was -65.43%, which is greater than IBOT's maximum drawdown of -25.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MO and IBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MO | IBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.43% | -25.39% | -40.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -16.74% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.40% | -25.39% | +8.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -2.92% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.92% | -5.02% | -6.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 4.13% | +2.37% |
Volatility
MO vs. IBOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Altria Group, Inc. (MO) is 6.71%, while VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) has a volatility of 9.29%. This indicates that MO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MO | IBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 9.29% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.60% | 19.07% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.59% | 23.06% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 22.37% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 22.37% | +0.60% |
Dividends
MO vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison
MO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than IBOT's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF | 0.31% | 0.38% | 2.81% | 2.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 5.84% | 7.21% | 7.65% | 9.52% | 8.05% | 7.43% | 8.29% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 3.56% | 3.48% | 3.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MO and IBOT have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBOT has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to MO (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MO dropped -65.43% vs IBOT's -25.39%.
IBOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MO and IBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer