PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNTRX vs. SENAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNTRX vs. SENAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund (SENAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNTRX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than SENAX's 7.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MNTRX has underperformed SENAX with an annualized return of 1.43%, while SENAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.


MNTRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.18%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
1.43%

SENAX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.48%
YTD
7.68%
6M
5.36%
1Y
14.54%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNTRX vs. SENAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNTRX
Allspring Core Bond Fund
0.29%7.16%1.38%5.37%-13.82%-2.10%8.51%8.18%-0.57%3.28%
SENAX
Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund
7.68%13.41%19.25%24.00%-41.92%2.58%57.96%40.64%-5.97%28.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MNTRX and SENAX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

-0.12

The correlation between MNTRX and SENAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNTRX vs. SENAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNTRX
MNTRX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MNTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MNTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SENAX
SENAX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SENAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SENAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SENAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SENAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SENAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNTRX vs. SENAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund (SENAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNTRXSENAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.15

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.16

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.28

4.05

+1.23

MNTRX vs. SENAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNTRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the SENAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNTRX and SENAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNTRXSENAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

0.83

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.09

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.45

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.30

+0.62

Drawdowns

MNTRX vs. SENAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNTRX drawdown since its inception was -19.36%, smaller than the maximum SENAX drawdown of -58.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTRX and SENAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNTRXSENAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.36%

-58.34%

+38.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-13.59%

+10.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.27%

-27.44%

+21.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-55.14%

+36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.36%

-55.14%

+35.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-13.12%

+9.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-17.71%

+15.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

3.88%

-2.88%

Volatility

MNTRX vs. SENAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) is 1.38%, while Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund (SENAX) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that MNTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SENAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNTRXSENAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

5.41%

-4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

15.38%

-12.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

19.07%

-15.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

28.79%

-22.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

25.83%

-20.87%

MNTRX vs. SENAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNTRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SENAX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNTRX vs. SENAX - Dividend Comparison

MNTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than SENAX's 11.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNTRX
Allspring Core Bond Fund
4.06%4.07%4.13%3.19%1.85%1.75%6.35%2.46%2.33%1.74%1.97%1.45%
SENAX
Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund
11.20%12.06%10.88%2.46%0.00%17.81%9.16%6.59%15.14%11.23%4.58%8.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNTRX and SENAX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SENAX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to MNTRX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNTRX dropped -19.36% vs SENAX's -58.34%.

MNTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNTRX and SENAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer