MNTRX vs. SCVAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX).
MNTRX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jun 30, 1997. SCVAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 31, 2002.
Performance
MNTRX vs. SCVAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNTRX vs. SCVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund | -0.34% | 7.16% | 1.38% | 5.37% | -13.82% | -2.10% | 8.51% | 8.18% | -0.57% | 3.28% |
SCVAX Allspring Small Company Value Fund | 6.99% | 1.75% | 8.22% | 15.19% | -12.13% | 36.81% | 1.99% | 22.20% | -14.18% | 11.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNTRX achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than SCVAX's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MNTRX has underperformed SCVAX with an annualized return of 1.46%, while SCVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.37% annualized return.
MNTRX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.46%
SCVAX
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 16.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNTRX vs. SCVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNTRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SCVAX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNTRX vs. SCVAX — Risk / Return Rank
MNTRX
SCVAX
MNTRX vs. SCVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNTRX | SCVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.81 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.30 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 4.96 | -0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNTRX | SCVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.81 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.25 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.40 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.44 | +0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNTRX and SCVAX is -0.17. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
MNTRX vs. SCVAX - Dividend Comparison
MNTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than SCVAX's 5.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund | 3.74% | 4.07% | 4.13% | 3.19% | 1.85% | 1.75% | 6.35% | 2.46% | 2.33% | 1.74% | 1.97% | 1.45% |
SCVAX Allspring Small Company Value Fund | 5.50% | 5.88% | 8.23% | 0.77% | 4.33% | 6.02% | 0.39% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.30% | 0.04% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
MNTRX vs. SCVAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNTRX drawdown since its inception was -19.36%, smaller than the maximum SCVAX drawdown of -70.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTRX and SCVAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNTRX | SCVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -70.30% | +50.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -13.76% | +10.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | -26.83% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.36% | -46.64% | +27.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -5.09% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -10.66% | +8.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 3.61% | -2.64% |
Volatility
MNTRX vs. SCVAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) is 1.58%, while Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that MNTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNTRX | SCVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 5.72% | -4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 12.69% | -10.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41% | 21.61% | -17.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.00% | 20.88% | -14.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 23.24% | -18.30% |