PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MNT.TO vs. XUU-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MNT.TO vs. XUU-U.TO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

MNT.TO (Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves) and XUU-U.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNT.TO is a Gold fund, while XUU-U.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. Over the past 5 years, MNT.TO returned 21.01%/yr vs 15.25%/yr for XUU-U.TO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

MNT.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MNT.TO is traded in CAD, while XUU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNT.TO achieves a -8.22% return, which is significantly lower than XUU-U.TO's 12.59% return.

MNT.TO

1D
1.74%
1M
-7.94%
YTD
-8.22%
6M
-10.90%
1Y
17.39%
3Y*
30.88%
5Y*
21.01%
10Y*
12.08%

XUU-U.TO

1D
0.03%
1M
1.24%
YTD
12.59%
6M
12.04%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
23.20%
5Y*
15.25%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNT.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MNT.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves		-8.22%61.23%44.81%3.61%10.52%-10.51%26.14%-0.76%
XUU-U.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF		12.59%11.40%33.28%23.90%-15.09%28.35%16.34%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MNT.TO and XUU-U.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019

-0.00

The correlation between MNT.TO and XUU-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (5 years) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves

iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF

Often compared with MNT.TO:
MNT.TO vs. KILO.TOMNT.TO vs. CGL-C.TOMNT.TO vs. PHYS.TOMNT.TO vs. XGD.TOMNT.TO vs. CGL.TOMNT.TO vs. ZGLD.TOMNT.TO vs. GLDM
Often compared with XUU-U.TO:
XUU-U.TO vs. VFV.TOXUU-U.TO vs. XEQT.TOXUU-U.TO vs. XUU.TOXUU-U.TO vs. XAW.TOXUU-U.TO vs. XUH.TOXUU-U.TO vs. SPYXUU-U.TO vs. ZLB.TO

Return for Risk

MNT.TO vs. XUU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MNT.TO
MNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO
XUU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XUU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNT.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MNT.TOXUU-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.56
2.06

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.95
2.86

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.39

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

2.94

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.54

11.15

-9.61

MNT.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the XUU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNT.TO and XUU-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNT.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, which is greater than XUU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNT.TO and XUU-U.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MNT.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-24.00%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.55%

-9.04%

-19.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.55%

-20.43%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.55%

-22.44%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.58%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.85%

-1.34%

-25.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.87%

-4.84%

-11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.33%

2.38%

+8.95%

Volatility

MNT.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.91% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) at 4.52%. This indicates that MNT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MNT.TOXUU-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.91%

4.52%

+4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.24%

10.46%

+15.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.97%

12.94%

+18.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.50%

17.26%

+3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

18.03%

+1.59%

Dividends

MNT.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

MNT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUU-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MNT.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUU-U.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF		0.85%1.15%1.05%1.14%1.32%0.97%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

MNT.TO and XUU-U.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNT.TO is categorized as Gold, while XUU-U.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNT.TO and XUU-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer