PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNT.TO vs. QQC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNT.TO vs. QQC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNT.TO achieves a -6.93% return, which is significantly lower than QQC.TO's 20.44% return.


MNT.TO

1D
-1.48%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
-6.93%
6M
-10.28%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
31.47%
5Y*
21.45%
10Y*
12.39%

QQC.TO

1D
-2.86%
1M
2.44%
YTD
20.44%
6M
19.25%
1Y
39.38%
3Y*
28.93%
5Y*
19.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNT.TO vs. QQC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MNT.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves
-6.93%61.23%44.81%3.61%10.52%-2.24%
QQC.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
20.44%15.38%35.74%51.68%-28.05%25.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MNT.TO and QQC.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021

-0.03

The correlation between MNT.TO and QQC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNT.TO vs. QQC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNT.TO
MNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QQC.TO
QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNT.TO vs. QQC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNT.TOQQC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.41

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

3.26

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.69

10.17

-8.48

MNT.TO vs. QQC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNT.TO and QQC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNT.TO vs. QQC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, which is greater than QQC.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNT.TO and QQC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNT.TOQQC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-31.81%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.55%

-12.14%

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.55%

-22.58%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.55%

-31.81%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.83%

-3.22%

-22.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.87%

-7.98%

-7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.06%

3.88%

+7.18%

Volatility

MNT.TO vs. QQC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) have volatilities of 8.23% and 8.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNT.TOQQC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.23%

8.52%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.05%

13.78%

+12.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.85%

17.19%

+13.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

21.13%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

21.01%

-1.41%

Dividends

MNT.TO vs. QQC.TO - Dividend Comparison

MNT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MNT.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQC.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
0.32%0.39%0.45%0.54%0.91%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNT.TO and QQC.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNT.TO is categorized as Gold, while QQC.TO is Nasdaq-100.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNT.TO and QQC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer