PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNT.TO vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNT.TO vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MNT.TO is traded in CAD, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNT.TO achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 4.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MNT.TO having a 13.75% annualized return and GLD not far ahead at 13.94%.


MNT.TO

1D
-0.59%
1M
-2.30%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
0.86%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
32.67%
5Y*
21.11%
10Y*
13.75%

GLD

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.31%
YTD
4.23%
6M
5.02%
1Y
33.74%
3Y*
32.62%
5Y*
21.53%
10Y*
13.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNT.TO vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNT.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves
-0.92%61.23%44.81%3.61%10.52%-10.51%26.14%13.47%5.87%5.52%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
4.23%56.17%37.54%10.21%6.30%-5.02%22.71%12.06%6.38%5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MNT.TO and GLD is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2011

0.75

The correlation between MNT.TO and GLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNT.TO vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNT.TO
MNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNT.TO vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNT.TOGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.27

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

1.96

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.13

4.81

-1.67

MNT.TO vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNT.TO and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNT.TOGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

1.34

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

1.28

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.91

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.65

-0.21

Drawdowns

MNT.TO vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, roughly equal to the maximum GLD drawdown of -33.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNT.TO and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNT.TOGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-33.56%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.01%

-17.28%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.01%

-17.28%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.01%

-17.47%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.58%

-22.85%

-10.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.04%

-15.45%

-5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-11.64%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.46%

7.04%

+2.42%

Volatility

MNT.TO vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) have volatilities of 5.13% and 5.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNT.TOGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

5.37%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.08%

21.82%

+3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.12%

25.39%

+4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

16.86%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

15.40%

+4.17%

Dividends

MNT.TO vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither MNT.TO nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MNT.TO and GLD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNT.TO and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer