MNRS vs. COZX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) and COZX (Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNRS is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index, while COZX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. MNRS is passively managed, while COZX is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MNRS charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for COZX.

Performance

MNRS vs. COZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) and Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNRS achieves a 45.71% return, which is significantly lower than COZX's 162.05% return.

MNRS

• 1D: -2.70%
• 1M: -6.56%
• YTD: 45.71%
• 6M: 35.00%
• 1Y: 95.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COZX

• 1D: -3.59%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: 162.05%
• 6M: 128.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNRS vs. COZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	45.71%	-34.28%
COZX Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF	162.05%	-61.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MNRS and COZX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

MNRS vs. COZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNRS

MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 37
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 38
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

COZX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNRS vs. COZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) and Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNRS	COZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.27	—	—

Drawdowns

MNRS vs. COZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNRS drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum COZX drawdown of -70.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRS and COZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNRS	COZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.70%	-70.44%	+13.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.68%	-14.40%	-5.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.32%	-40.96%	+17.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.17%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MNRS	COZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.85%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.30%	136.00%	-64.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.73%	136.00%	-65.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.73%	136.00%	-65.27%

MNRS vs. COZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNRS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than COZX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNRS vs. COZX - Dividend Comparison

MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while COZX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
COZX Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.37%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNRS and COZX in my portfolio?

MNRS and COZX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MNRS or COZX?

On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MNRS or COZX?

MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for COZX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MNRS or COZX?

MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for COZX.

What is the main difference between MNRS and COZX?

MNRS is categorized as Blockchain, while COZX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MNRS and 1.30% for COZX.