MNRS.AX vs. QOZ.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

MNRS.AX (Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF) and QOZ.AX (BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNRS.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged Index, while QOZ.AX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MNRS.AX returned 16.26%/yr vs 8.47%/yr for QOZ.AX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MNRS.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNRS.AX achieves a -15.43% return, which is significantly lower than QOZ.AX's 5.36% return.

MNRS.AX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -11.41%
• 6M: -25.22%
• YTD: -15.43%
• 1Y: 39.76%
• 3Y*: 34.79%
• 5Y*: 16.26%
• 10Y*: —

QOZ.AX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.89%
• 6M: 4.91%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 1Y: 14.79%
• 3Y*: 11.72%
• 5Y*: 8.47%
• 10Y*: 8.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNRS.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MNRS.AX Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF	-15.43%	154.64%	16.03%	-0.92%	-8.42%	-8.79%	28.38%	53.58%	-7.67%	-1.31%
QOZ.AX BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF	5.36%	14.57%	8.09%	8.49%	3.17%	17.17%	-0.13%	18.60%	-5.96%	9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MNRS.AX and QOZ.AX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2016	0.16

Over the past year, MNRS.AX and QOZ.AX have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

MNRS.AX vs. QOZ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNRS.AX

MNRS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 27
MNRS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MNRS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MNRS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MNRS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
MNRS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

QOZ.AX

QOZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 42
QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QOZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
QOZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
QOZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
QOZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNRS.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNRS.AX	QOZ.AX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	1.32	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	1.85	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.23	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	1.82	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.39	4.58	-2.19

MNRS.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNRS.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNRS.AX and QOZ.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MNRS.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNRS.AX drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, which is greater than QOZ.AX's maximum drawdown of -37.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRS.AX and QOZ.AX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNRS.AX	QOZ.AX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.71%	-37.05%	-10.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.82%	-8.60%	-28.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.82%	-13.67%	-23.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.59%	-14.87%	-23.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.46%	-3.17%	-33.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.39%	-4.61%	-18.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.97%	3.44%	+13.53%

Volatility

MNRS.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) has a higher volatility of 13.92% compared to BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX) at 2.43%. This indicates that MNRS.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QOZ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNRS.AX	QOZ.AX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.92%	2.43%	+11.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.61%	9.38%	+32.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.17%	11.91%	+36.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.23%	12.87%	+21.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.89%	14.67%	+19.22%

Dividends

MNRS.AX vs. QOZ.AX - Dividend Comparison

MNRS.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than QOZ.AX's 2.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MNRS.AX Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF	9.30%	0.15%	1.30%	0.00%	0.00%	3.25%	2.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QOZ.AX BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF	2.26%	2.07%	2.42%	2.75%	4.97%	3.96%	3.30%	6.45%	4.28%	1.82%	3.62%	6.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNRS.AX and QOZ.AX in my portfolio?

MNRS.AX and QOZ.AX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between MNRS.AX and QOZ.AX?

MNRS.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while QOZ.AX is Large Cap Value Equities. MNRS.AX tracks Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged Index, while QOZ.AX tracks FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index.