PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MNRS.AX vs. IFRA.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MNRS.AX vs. IFRA.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

MNRS.AX (Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF) and IFRA.AX (VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MNRS.AX tracks the Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged Index while IFRA.AX tracks the VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MNRS.AX returned 16.26%/yr vs 6.59%/yr for IFRA.AX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MNRS.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) and VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (IFRA.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNRS.AX achieves a -15.43% return, which is significantly lower than IFRA.AX's 10.62% return.

MNRS.AX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-11.41%
6M
-25.22%
YTD
-15.43%
1Y
39.76%
3Y*
34.79%
5Y*
16.26%
10Y*
—

IFRA.AX

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.16%
6M
11.95%
YTD
10.62%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
6.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNRS.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNRS.AX
Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF		-15.43%154.64%16.03%-0.92%-8.42%-8.79%28.38%53.58%-7.67%-1.31%
IFRA.AX
VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		10.62%11.93%10.70%-1.66%-4.04%16.80%-8.44%23.88%-3.41%13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MNRS.AX and IFRA.AX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2016

0.18

The correlation between MNRS.AX and IFRA.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF

VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

Return for Risk

MNRS.AX vs. IFRA.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MNRS.AX
MNRS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MNRS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNRS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNRS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MNRS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNRS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX
IFRA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IFRA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNRS.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) and VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (IFRA.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MNRS.AXIFRA.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.83
1.52

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.30
2.19

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.99

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.39

7.68

-5.28

MNRS.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNRS.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the IFRA.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNRS.AX and IFRA.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNRS.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNRS.AX drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, which is greater than IFRA.AX's maximum drawdown of -36.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRS.AX and IFRA.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MNRS.AXIFRA.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.71%

-36.36%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.82%

-5.54%

-31.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.82%

-12.79%

-24.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.59%

-21.19%

-17.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-36.36%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.46%

-1.65%

-34.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.39%

-6.01%

-17.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.97%

2.20%

+14.77%

Volatility

MNRS.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) has a higher volatility of 13.92% compared to VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (IFRA.AX) at 3.82%. This indicates that MNRS.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFRA.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MNRS.AXIFRA.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.92%

3.82%

+10.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.61%

9.13%

+32.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.17%

10.95%

+37.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.23%

14.30%

+19.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.89%

15.06%

+18.83%

Dividends

MNRS.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Dividend Comparison

MNRS.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than IFRA.AX's 2.23% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IFRA.AX
VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		2.23%3.15%1.61%2.51%2.31%2.93%3.58%3.29%2.91%2.11%1.60%
MNRS.AX
Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF		9.30%0.15%1.30%0.00%0.00%3.25%2.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MNRS.AX and IFRA.AX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNRS.AX tracks Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged Index, while IFRA.AX tracks VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and VanEck.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNRS.AX and IFRA.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer