PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MNRS.AX vs. FUEL.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MNRS.AX vs. FUEL.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

MNRS.AX (Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF) and FUEL.AX (Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF) are both Global Equities funds from BetaShares - MNRS.AX tracks the Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged Index while FUEL.AX tracks the Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MNRS.AX returned 16.26%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for FUEL.AX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MNRS.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) and Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNRS.AX achieves a -15.43% return, which is significantly lower than FUEL.AX's 24.46% return.

MNRS.AX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-11.41%
6M
-25.22%
YTD
-15.43%
1Y
39.76%
3Y*
34.79%
5Y*
16.26%
10Y*
—

FUEL.AX

1D
-0.73%
1M
-0.67%
6M
17.84%
YTD
24.46%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
5.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNRS.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNRS.AX
Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF		-15.43%154.64%16.03%-0.92%-8.42%-8.79%28.38%53.58%-7.67%-1.31%
FUEL.AX
Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF		24.46%10.28%-1.04%-2.17%37.74%29.02%-32.28%10.04%-11.41%2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MNRS.AX and FUEL.AX is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2016

0.12

The correlation between MNRS.AX and FUEL.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF

Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF

Return for Risk

MNRS.AX vs. FUEL.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MNRS.AX
MNRS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MNRS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNRS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNRS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MNRS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNRS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX
FUEL.AX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FUEL.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUEL.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNRS.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) and Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MNRS.AXFUEL.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.83
1.39

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.30
2.03

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.42

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.39

7.20

-4.81

MNRS.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNRS.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the FUEL.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNRS.AX and FUEL.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNRS.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNRS.AX drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, smaller than the maximum FUEL.AX drawdown of -65.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRS.AX and FUEL.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MNRS.AXFUEL.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.71%

-65.66%

+17.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.82%

-12.87%

-23.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.82%

-22.90%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.59%

-23.54%

-15.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-65.66%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.46%

-7.65%

-28.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.39%

-13.62%

-9.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.97%

4.37%

+12.60%

Volatility

MNRS.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF (MNRS.AX) has a higher volatility of 13.92% compared to Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX) at 5.70%. This indicates that MNRS.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUEL.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MNRS.AXFUEL.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.92%

5.70%

+8.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.61%

19.38%

+22.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.17%

22.36%

+25.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.23%

24.26%

+9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.89%

26.38%

+7.51%

Dividends

MNRS.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Dividend Comparison

MNRS.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than FUEL.AX's 3.37% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUEL.AX
Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF		3.37%0.00%2.16%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.64%1.25%1.92%3.02%
MNRS.AX
Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF		9.30%0.15%1.30%0.00%0.00%3.25%2.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MNRS.AX and FUEL.AX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNRS.AX tracks Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged Index, while FUEL.AX tracks Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNRS.AX and FUEL.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer