PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNNAX vs. SVPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNNAX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNNAX achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 1.59% return.


MNNAX

1D
-1.69%
1M
0.66%
YTD
12.93%
6M
11.33%
1Y
30.87%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
15.46%
10Y*
15.07%

SVPFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.69%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNNAX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MNNAX
Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund
12.93%21.78%25.59%24.59%-19.03%22.25%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
1.59%4.19%3.82%5.30%-4.37%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MNNAX and SVPFX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021

0.10

The correlation between MNNAX and SVPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (5 years) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNNAX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNNAX
MNNAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MNNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MNNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SVPFX
SVPFX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SVPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SVPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNNAX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNNAXSVPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.49

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.36

11.69

+3.67

MNNAX vs. SVPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNNAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the SVPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNNAX and SVPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNNAX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNNAX drawdown since its inception was -92.93%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNNAX and SVPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNNAXSVPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.93%

-6.37%

-86.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-1.33%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-5.32%

-13.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.29%

-6.37%

-23.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-0.20%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.65%

-1.91%

-48.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

0.39%

+1.72%

Volatility

MNNAX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 1.01%. This indicates that MNNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNNAXSVPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

1.01%

+4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

1.71%

+9.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

2.40%

+12.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.09%

5.61%

+14.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

5.50%

+14.82%

MNNAX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNNAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNNAX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison

MNNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.73%, more than SVPFX's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNNAX
Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund
12.73%14.38%8.72%4.65%15.37%10.88%0.07%2.76%19.25%5.28%0.00%21.54%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
2.47%1.83%4.37%4.29%0.76%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNNAX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNNAX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to SVPFX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNNAX dropped -92.93% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.

MNNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNNAX and SVPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer