MNNAX vs. RESGX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

MNNAX (Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund) and RESGX (Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MNNAX returned 14.47%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for RESGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MNNAX charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RESGX.

Performance

MNNAX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNNAX achieves a 14.57% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 24.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MNNAX has outperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 14.47%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.45% annualized return.

MNNAX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -0.57%
• 6M: 11.95%
• YTD: 14.57%
• 1Y: 28.45%
• 3Y*: 22.49%
• 5Y*: 15.52%
• 10Y*: 14.47%

RESGX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.20%
• 6M: 18.56%
• YTD: 24.29%
• 1Y: 36.91%
• 3Y*: 17.13%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: 12.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNNAX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MNNAX Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund	14.57%	21.78%	25.59%	24.59%	-19.03%	35.03%	11.18%	28.33%	-14.68%	28.41%
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	24.29%	10.30%	11.40%	15.59%	-14.71%	26.58%	9.57%	24.25%	-6.47%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MNNAX and RESGX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.90

The correlation between MNNAX and RESGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MNNAX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNNAX

MNNAX Risk / Return Rank: 76
MNNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
MNNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
MNNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
MNNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
MNNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

RESGX

RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 89
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNNAX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNNAX	RESGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.42	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	3.35	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.42	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	4.59	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.08	15.40	-2.33

MNNAX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNNAX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MNNAX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNNAX drawdown since its inception was -92.93%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNNAX and RESGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNNAX	RESGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.93%	-37.80%	-55.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.72%	-7.84%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	-20.50%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.29%	-23.58%	-6.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.01%	-37.80%	-0.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-2.83%	+2.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.56%	-4.98%	-45.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	2.33%	-0.20%

Volatility

MNNAX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) at 3.55%. This indicates that MNNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNNAX	RESGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	3.55%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.72%	11.63%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.71%	14.84%	-0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.09%	17.32%	+2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.29%	18.65%	+1.64%

MNNAX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNNAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNNAX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

MNNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%, more than RESGX's 6.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MNNAX Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund	12.55%	14.38%	8.72%	4.65%	15.37%	10.88%	0.07%	2.76%	19.25%	5.28%	0.00%	21.54%
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	6.86%	8.24%	13.38%	9.08%	8.17%	9.98%	0.82%	1.90%	5.09%	0.94%	0.72%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNNAX and RESGX in my portfolio?

MNNAX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MNNAX or RESGX?

MNNAX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to RESGX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNNAX dropped -92.93% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.