MNNAX vs. FSUVX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MNNAX (Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund) and FSUVX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund) are both mutual funds - MNNAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Victory, while FSUVX is a Low Volatility fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, MNNAX returned 14.55%/yr vs 11.25%/yr for FSUVX. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MNNAX charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for FSUVX.

Performance

MNNAX vs. FSUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNNAX achieves a 15.12% return, which is significantly higher than FSUVX's 9.34% return. Over the past 10 years, MNNAX has outperformed FSUVX with an annualized return of 14.55%, while FSUVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.25% annualized return.

MNNAX

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: 12.11%
• YTD: 15.12%
• 1Y: 26.17%
• 3Y*: 22.90%
• 5Y*: 14.95%
• 10Y*: 14.55%
• ALL TIME*: 10.80%

FSUVX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 1.71%
• 6M: 6.90%
• YTD: 9.34%
• 1Y: 13.97%
• 3Y*: 15.08%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: 11.25%
• ALL TIME*: 11.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSUVX Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MNNAX Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MNNAX vs. FSUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MNNAX Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund	15.12%	21.78%	25.59%	24.59%	-19.03%	35.03%	11.18%	28.33%	-14.68%	28.41%
FSUVX Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund	9.34%	11.03%	17.40%	14.80%	-10.93%	21.51%	9.86%	27.73%	1.35%	17.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MNNAX and FSUVX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2015	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between MNNAX and FSUVX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MNNAX vs. FSUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MNNAX

MNNAX Risk / Return Rank: 77
MNNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MNNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
MNNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MNNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
MNNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FSUVX

FSUVX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FSUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FSUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FSUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FSUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FSUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MNNAX vs. FSUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNNAX	FSUVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.75	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	2.53	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.31	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	2.15	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.32	8.82	+4.50

MNNAX vs. FSUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FSUVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNNAX and FSUVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MNNAX vs. FSUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNNAX drawdown since its inception was -92.93%, which is greater than FSUVX's maximum drawdown of -32.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNNAX and FSUVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNNAX	FSUVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.93%	-32.41%	-60.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.72%	-7.28%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	-11.55%	-7.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.29%	-19.48%	-10.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.01%	-32.41%	-5.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.12%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.46%	-3.25%	-47.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	1.77%	+0.37%

Volatility

MNNAX vs. FSUVX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) at 2.87%. This indicates that MNNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSUVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNNAX	FSUVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	2.87%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.78%	7.11%	+4.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.94%	8.97%	+5.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.09%	13.00%	+7.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.31%	15.20%	+5.11%

MNNAX vs. FSUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNNAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FSUVX's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNNAX vs. FSUVX - Dividend Comparison

MNNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.49%, more than FSUVX's 4.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSUVX Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund	4.07%	4.45%	2.25%	1.74%	4.12%	3.52%	1.31%	3.80%	2.63%	2.94%	2.23%	1.17%
MNNAX Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund	12.49%	14.38%	8.72%	4.65%	15.37%	10.88%	0.07%	2.76%	19.25%	5.28%	0.00%	21.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNNAX and FSUVX in my portfolio?

MNNAX and FSUVX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MNNAX or FSUVX?

MNNAX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to FSUVX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNNAX dropped -92.93% vs FSUVX's -32.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.