PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNNAX vs. AUEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNNAX vs. AUEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNNAX achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly higher than AUEIX's 7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MNNAX has outperformed AUEIX with an annualized return of 14.89%, while AUEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.02% annualized return.


MNNAX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.19%
YTD
15.09%
6M
15.25%
1Y
36.76%
3Y*
25.06%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
14.89%

AUEIX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.77%
YTD
7.03%
6M
6.47%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
11.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNNAX vs. AUEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNNAX
Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund
15.09%21.78%25.59%24.59%-19.03%35.03%11.18%28.33%-14.68%28.41%
AUEIX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund
7.03%6.95%13.85%9.49%-13.81%23.52%13.10%28.63%-0.27%22.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MNNAX and AUEIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2012

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between MNNAX and AUEIX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNNAX vs. AUEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNNAX
MNNAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MNNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MNNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

AUEIX
AUEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AUEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AUEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNNAX vs. AUEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNNAXAUEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.18

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

1.40

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.34

4.69

+13.66

MNNAX vs. AUEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNNAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the AUEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNNAX and AUEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNNAXAUEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

1.05

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.53

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.73

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.86

-0.48

Drawdowns

MNNAX vs. AUEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNNAX drawdown since its inception was -92.93%, which is greater than AUEIX's maximum drawdown of -30.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNNAX and AUEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNNAXAUEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.93%

-30.82%

-62.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-5.91%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-10.27%

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.29%

-22.08%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.01%

-30.82%

-7.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.75%

-3.42%

-47.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.77%

+0.29%

Volatility

MNNAX vs. AUEIX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX) at 1.90%. This indicates that MNNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNNAXAUEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

1.90%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

5.60%

+5.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

7.91%

+6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.99%

12.99%

+7.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

15.19%

+5.12%

MNNAX vs. AUEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNNAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than AUEIX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNNAX vs. AUEIX - Dividend Comparison

MNNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.49%, less than AUEIX's 21.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUEIX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund
21.21%22.70%24.31%24.28%10.26%2.54%1.29%1.12%1.67%2.36%1.99%6.18%
MNNAX
Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund
12.49%14.38%8.72%4.65%15.37%10.88%0.07%2.76%19.25%5.28%0.00%21.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNNAX and AUEIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNNAX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to AUEIX (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNNAX dropped -92.93% vs AUEIX's -30.82%.

MNNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNNAX and AUEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer