MNHYX vs. EXCRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) and Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX).
MNHYX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 2009. EXCRX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 21, 2005.
Performance
MNHYX vs. EXCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNHYX vs. EXCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | -0.59% | 6.65% | 9.63% | 13.19% | -7.59% | 9.99% | 6.26% | 13.99% | -1.30% | 8.49% |
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | -0.06% | 6.82% | 1.05% | 5.47% | -13.20% | -1.89% | 8.66% | 8.18% | -0.74% | 2.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNHYX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than EXCRX's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MNHYX has outperformed EXCRX with an annualized return of 6.65%, while EXCRX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.
MNHYX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 5.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.65%
EXCRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNHYX vs. EXCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNHYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EXCRX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNHYX vs. EXCRX — Risk / Return Rank
MNHYX
EXCRX
MNHYX vs. EXCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) and Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNHYX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | 0.85 | +0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 1.22 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.15 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.29 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | 3.59 | +2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNHYX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 0.85 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.48 | -0.00 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.61 | 0.33 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.80 | 0.72 | +1.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNHYX and EXCRX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MNHYX vs. EXCRX - Dividend Comparison
MNHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, more than EXCRX's 4.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | 6.89% | 6.95% | 6.38% | 6.66% | 5.93% | 7.93% | 4.98% | 6.63% | 5.26% | 5.16% | 6.49% | 5.60% |
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | 4.26% | 4.18% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 5.15% | 2.01% | 2.32% | 1.94% | 2.14% | 2.45% |
Drawdowns
MNHYX vs. EXCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNHYX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, which is greater than EXCRX's maximum drawdown of -18.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNHYX and EXCRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNHYX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.70% | -18.70% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.38% | -3.09% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.84% | -18.65% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.70% | -18.70% | -1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -3.11% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -2.87% | +1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 1.11% | -0.25% |
Volatility
MNHYX vs. EXCRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) is 1.62%, while Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) has a volatility of 1.79%. This indicates that MNHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNHYX | EXCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 1.79% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.12% | 2.73% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68% | 4.60% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 5.87% | -2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 4.83% | -0.68% |