MNBD vs. FBDC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MNBD (ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF) and FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNBD is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by ALPS, while FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MNBD charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for FBDC.

Performance

MNBD vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNBD achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -9.51% return.

MNBD

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 6M: 1.65%
• 1Y: 6.31%
• 3Y*: 4.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBDC

• 1D: -2.98%
• 1M: -7.81%
• YTD: -9.51%
• 6M: -10.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNBD vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MNBD ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	1.33%	3.96%
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	-9.51%	-2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MNBD and FBDC is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.03

Return for Risk

MNBD vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNBD

MNBD Risk / Return Rank: 71
MNBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
MNBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
MNBD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MNBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
MNBD Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNBD vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MNBD	FBDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.75	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MNBD	FBDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	-0.70	+1.90

Drawdowns

MNBD vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNBD drawdown since its inception was -5.89%, smaller than the maximum FBDC drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBD and FBDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNBD	FBDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.89%	-20.60%	+14.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-17.24%	+16.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.09%	-10.14%	+9.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MNBD	FBDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.87%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50%	18.06%	-15.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.78%	18.06%	-14.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.78%	18.06%	-14.28%

MNBD vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNBD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNBD vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison

MNBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than FBDC's 11.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	11.52%	5.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MNBD ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	3.32%	3.32%	3.83%	3.44%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNBD and FBDC in my portfolio?

MNBD and FBDC have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MNBD or FBDC?

On fees, MNBD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MNBD or FBDC?

MNBD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MNBD or FBDC?

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 3.32% for MNBD.

What is the main difference between MNBD and FBDC?

MNBD is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FBDC is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MNBD and 1.35% for FBDC.