MMU vs. LSMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX).
MMU is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 26, 1992. LSMSX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 22, 2015.
Performance
MMU vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MMU vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMU Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc | 0.03% | 9.19% | 6.58% | 5.63% | -19.58% | 5.83% | 0.71% | 10.08% | -4.55% | 6.38% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | -0.27% | 3.22% | 2.22% | 7.96% | -10.03% | 4.11% | 4.48% | 8.16% | 0.46% | 4.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMU achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than LSMSX's -0.27% return.
MMU
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.40%
- 10Y*
- 1.38%
LSMSX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MMU vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMU has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MMU vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank
MMU
LSMSX
MMU vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMU | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 0.67 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 0.89 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.20 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 0.71 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.03 | 1.98 | +1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMU | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.67 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.25 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.58 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between MMU and LSMSX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MMU vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison
MMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, more than LSMSX's 3.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMU Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc | 6.36% | 6.26% | 6.16% | 4.36% | 4.65% | 3.88% | 4.21% | 4.96% | 5.68% | 5.37% | 5.67% | 5.50% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 3.97% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.37% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 2.55% | 2.34% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MMU vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMU drawdown since its inception was -34.51%, which is greater than LSMSX's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMU and LSMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMU | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.51% | -15.00% | -19.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.54% | -6.21% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.89% | -15.00% | -16.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | -2.62% | -4.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -2.88% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 2.21% | +0.16% |
Volatility
MMU vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison
Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) at 1.10%. This indicates that MMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MMU | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 1.10% | +3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.12% | 1.60% | +4.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.22% | 5.78% | +3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.63% | 4.44% | +6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.02% | 4.52% | +8.50% |