MMU vs. DFCMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MMU (Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc) and DFCMX (DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, MMU returned 1.34%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for DFCMX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMU charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DFCMX.

Performance

MMU vs. DFCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU) and DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MMU having a 0.80% return and DFCMX slightly higher at 0.83%. Over the past 10 years, MMU has outperformed DFCMX with an annualized return of 1.34%, while DFCMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.19% annualized return.

MMU

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 10.71%
• 3Y*: 7.59%
• 5Y*: -0.31%
• 10Y*: 1.34%

DFCMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 1.04%
• 1Y: 2.60%
• 3Y*: 2.61%
• 5Y*: 1.54%
• 10Y*: 1.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMU vs. DFCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MMU Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc	0.80%	9.19%	6.58%	5.63%	-19.58%	5.83%	0.71%	10.08%	-4.55%	8.30%
DFCMX DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio	0.83%	2.55%	2.84%	2.53%	-0.76%	-0.13%	0.67%	1.84%	1.24%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MMU and DFCMX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012	0.18

Return for Risk

MMU vs. DFCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMU

MMU Risk / Return Rank: 23
MMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MMU Omega Ratio Rank: 23
MMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MMU Martin Ratio Rank: 24

DFCMX

DFCMX Risk / Return Rank: 99
DFCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DFCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
DFCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
DFCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
DFCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMU vs. DFCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU) and DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMU	DFCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	4.46	-3.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	10.44	-8.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	4.85	-3.60
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	12.90	-11.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.15	44.40	-38.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MMU vs. DFCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the DFCMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMU and DFCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMU	DFCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	4.46	-3.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	1.73	-1.76
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	1.36	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	1.31	-0.93

Drawdowns

MMU vs. DFCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMU drawdown since its inception was -34.51%, which is greater than DFCMX's maximum drawdown of -2.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMU and DFCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMU	DFCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.51%	-2.20%	-32.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	-0.20%	-5.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.86%	-0.68%	-12.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.89%	-2.20%	-29.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.51%	-2.20%	-32.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.26%	0.00%	-6.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.83%	-0.26%	-6.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.67%	0.06%	+1.61%

Volatility

MMU vs. DFCMX - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX) at 0.13%. This indicates that MMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMU	DFCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.50%	0.13%	+2.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.09%	0.41%	+6.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.30%	0.59%	+7.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.68%	0.89%	+9.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.01%	0.88%	+12.13%

MMU vs. DFCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMU has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than DFCMX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MMU vs. DFCMX - Dividend Comparison

MMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than DFCMX's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFCMX DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio	2.48%	2.23%	2.61%	1.70%	0.71%	0.36%	0.87%	1.43%	1.04%	0.87%	0.86%	0.82%
MMU Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc	6.38%	6.26%	6.16%	4.36%	4.65%	3.88%	4.21%	4.96%	5.68%	5.37%	5.67%	5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMU and DFCMX in my portfolio?

MMU and DFCMX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMU or DFCMX?

MMU has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to DFCMX (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMU dropped -34.51% vs DFCMX's -2.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.46 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.