MMKT vs. VGVT
MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) and VGVT (Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMKT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Texas Capital, while VGVT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMKT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VGVT.
Performance
MMKT vs. VGVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMKT achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly higher than VGVT's 0.11% return.
MMKT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGVT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMKT vs. VGVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 1.44% | 1.94% |
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 0.11% | 3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMKT and VGVT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMKT vs. VGVT — Risk / Return Rank
MMKT
VGVT
MMKT vs. VGVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMKT | VGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 15.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 153.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 910.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMKT | VGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 17.60 | 1.17 | +16.43 |
Drawdowns
MMKT vs. VGVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMKT drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum VGVT drawdown of -2.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMKT and VGVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMKT | VGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -2.77% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.76% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.67% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility
MMKT vs. VGVT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMKT | VGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23% | 3.22% | -2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.23% | 3.22% | -2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.23% | 3.22% | -2.99% |
MMKT vs. VGVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMKT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VGVT's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MMKT vs. VGVT - Dividend Comparison
MMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than VGVT's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 3.73% | 3.98% | 1.07% |
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 3.99% | 2.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMKT and VGVT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGVT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGVT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MMKT.
VGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 3.73% for MMKT.
MMKT is categorized as Money Market, while VGVT is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MMKT and 0.10% for VGVT.
Find the right allocation for MMKT and VGVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer