MMKT vs. CHPS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMKT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Texas Capital, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. MMKT is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Over the past year, MMKT returned 3.76% vs 148.08% for CHPS. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. MMKT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

MMKT vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMKT achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 87.17% return.

MMKT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 1.74%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 1Y: 3.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: -5.25%
• 1M: -8.40%
• 6M: 68.06%
• YTD: 87.17%
• 1Y: 148.08%
• 3Y*: 52.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMKT vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF	1.83%	4.13%	1.22%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	87.17%	58.47%	-5.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MMKT and CHPS is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	-0.07

The correlation between MMKT and CHPS shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MMKT vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMKT

MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 95
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMKT vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MMKT	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	16.91	3.48	+13.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	63.12	3.55	+59.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	16.15	1.48	+14.66
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	151.60	8.37	+143.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	914.42	27.10	+887.32

MMKT vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMKT Sharpe Ratio is 16.91, which is higher than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMKT and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MMKT vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMKT drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMKT and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMKT	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.04%	-39.44%	+39.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.02%	-17.80%	+17.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-17.80%	+17.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-9.12%	+9.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	5.49%	-5.49%

Volatility

MMKT vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) is 0.05%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 23.50%. This indicates that MMKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMKT	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.05%	23.50%	-23.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.13%	37.65%	-37.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22%	42.85%	-42.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.23%	36.44%	-36.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.23%	36.44%	-36.21%

MMKT vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMKT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MMKT vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

MMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than CHPS's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.35%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF	3.68%	3.98%	1.07%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMKT and CHPS in my portfolio?

MMKT and CHPS have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMKT or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (23.50%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMKT dropped -0.04% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, MMKT or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 148.08% vs 3.76% for MMKT. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MMKT or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 148.08% return vs 3.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMKT or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MMKT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMKT or CHPS?

MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.35% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between MMKT and CHPS?

MMKT is categorized as Money Market, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MMKT and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.91 vs 3.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.