PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMKT vs. BKUI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMKT vs. BKUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MMKT having a 1.44% return and BKUI slightly lower at 1.42%.


MMKT

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BKUI

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.74%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMKT vs. BKUI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
1.44%4.13%1.21%
BKUI
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
1.42%4.93%1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MMKT and BKUI is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2024

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMKT vs. BKUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BKUI
BKUI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BKUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKUI Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BKUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKUI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMKT vs. BKUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMKTBKUIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+37.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

15.14

6.02

+9.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

153.44

32.56

+120.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

910.67

230.94

+679.73

MMKT vs. BKUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMKT Sharpe Ratio is 16.49, which is higher than the BKUI Sharpe Ratio of 10.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMKT and BKUI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMKTBKUIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49

10.52

+5.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

17.60

6.08

+11.52

Drawdowns

MMKT vs. BKUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMKT drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum BKUI drawdown of -1.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMKT and BKUI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMKTBKUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-1.72%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-0.13%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.01%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.02%

-0.02%

Volatility

MMKT vs. BKUI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) is 0.05%, while BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) has a volatility of 0.15%. This indicates that MMKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMKTBKUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

0.15%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

0.31%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23%

0.41%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.23%

0.59%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.23%

0.59%

-0.36%

MMKT vs. BKUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMKT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BKUI's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MMKT vs. BKUI - Dividend Comparison

MMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than BKUI's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BKUI
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
4.21%4.48%5.11%4.29%1.82%0.22%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.73%3.98%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMKT and BKUI have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKUI has higher volatility (0.15%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMKT dropped -0.04% vs BKUI's -1.72%.

On 1-year performance, BKUI leads with 4.32% vs 3.81% for MMKT. On fees, BKUI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BKUI has performed better with a 4.32% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKUI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MMKT.

BKUI has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.73% for MMKT.

MMKT is categorized as Money Market, while BKUI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MMKT and 0.12% for BKUI.

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.49 vs 10.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMKT and BKUI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer