MMGEX vs. VRTGX
Compare and contrast key facts about MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund (MMGEX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX).
MMGEX is managed by MassMutual. It was launched on May 3, 1999. VRTGX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 25, 2011.
Performance
MMGEX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MMGEX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGEX MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund | -1.89% | 10.66% | 14.79% | 16.35% | -26.21% | 8.52% | 40.08% | 61.40% | -5.46% | 24.28% |
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | -6.77% | 12.97% | 15.26% | 18.80% | -26.30% | 2.82% | 34.81% | 28.84% | -9.21% | 22.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMGEX achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly higher than VRTGX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MMGEX has outperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of 13.31%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.37% annualized return.
MMGEX
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- -1.89%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 20.94%
- 3Y*
- 11.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
VRTGX
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -5.62%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MMGEX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMGEX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MMGEX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank
MMGEX
VRTGX
MMGEX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund (MMGEX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMGEX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 0.71 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 1.15 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.14 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 1.02 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 3.52 | +2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMGEX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.71 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.03 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.39 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.45 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between MMGEX and VRTGX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MMGEX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison
MMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.67%, more than VRTGX's 0.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGEX MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund | 38.67% | 37.94% | 8.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 44.40% | 10.36% | 32.83% | 29.40% | 6.91% | 0.00% | 33.83% |
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | 0.77% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 0.78% | 0.54% | 0.53% | 0.90% | 0.85% | 0.75% | 1.07% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
MMGEX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMGEX drawdown since its inception was -63.65%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMGEX and VRTGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMGEX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.65% | -41.97% | -21.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -14.80% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.21% | -40.48% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.21% | -41.97% | -9.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.06% | -14.80% | -8.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.52% | -10.53% | -12.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 4.30% | -1.10% |
Volatility
MMGEX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison
MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund (MMGEX) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) at 7.60%. This indicates that MMGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MMGEX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.49% | 7.60% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.88% | 16.04% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.38% | 25.09% | -1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.35% | 24.47% | +7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.90% | 24.41% | +4.49% |