PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMGEX vs. DSCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMGEX vs. DSCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund (MMGEX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMGEX achieves a 20.51% return, which is significantly lower than DSCIX's 24.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MMGEX has outperformed DSCIX with an annualized return of 14.72%, while DSCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.77% annualized return.


MMGEX

1D
3.12%
1M
-3.67%
6M
14.34%
YTD
20.51%
1Y
35.12%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
14.72%
ALL TIME*
8.20%

DSCIX

1D
0.71%
1M
-2.55%
6M
18.24%
YTD
24.24%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
9.77%
ALL TIME*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MMGEX vs. DSCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMGEX
MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund
20.51%10.66%14.79%16.35%-26.21%8.52%40.08%61.40%-5.46%24.28%
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
24.24%13.18%5.10%20.00%-21.46%30.92%13.33%21.51%-16.96%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MMGEX and DSCIX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.93

The correlation between MMGEX and DSCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMGEX vs. DSCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MMGEX
MMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DSCIX
DSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MMGEX vs. DSCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund (MMGEX) and Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMGEXDSCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

5.44

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.77

18.73

-7.97

MMGEX vs. DSCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMGEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the DSCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMGEX and DSCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMGEX vs. DSCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMGEX drawdown since its inception was -63.65%, which is greater than DSCIX's maximum drawdown of -47.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMGEX and DSCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMGEXDSCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.65%

-47.60%

-16.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-7.08%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

-32.94%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.21%

-32.94%

-18.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.21%

-47.60%

-3.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-4.18%

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-9.74%

-13.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.05%

+0.89%

Volatility

MMGEX vs. DSCIX - Volatility Comparison

MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund (MMGEX) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) at 3.80%. This indicates that MMGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMGEXDSCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

3.80%

+2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.21%

12.39%

+4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.45%

17.23%

+4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.60%

22.12%

+10.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.04%

23.20%

+5.84%

MMGEX vs. DSCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMGEX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than DSCIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMGEX vs. DSCIX - Dividend Comparison

MMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.48%, more than DSCIX's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSCIX
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund
4.79%6.01%0.16%0.30%4.99%8.71%0.05%0.00%9.11%0.03%0.18%0.00%
MMGEX
MassMutual Small Cap Growth Equity Fund
31.48%37.94%8.94%0.00%0.00%44.40%10.36%32.83%29.40%6.91%0.00%33.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMGEX and DSCIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMGEX has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to DSCIX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMGEX dropped -63.65% vs DSCIX's -47.60%.

DSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMGEX and DSCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer