PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLXIX vs. RYEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLXIX vs. RYEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Rydex Energy Fund (RYEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLXIX achieves a 30.50% return, which is significantly lower than RYEIX's 35.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MLXIX has outperformed RYEIX with an annualized return of 10.89%, while RYEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.68% annualized return.


MLXIX

1D
1.17%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
30.50%
6M
28.82%
1Y
19.89%
3Y*
24.52%
5Y*
19.89%
10Y*
10.89%

RYEIX

1D
1.86%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
35.81%
6M
31.02%
1Y
51.80%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
17.42%
10Y*
6.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLXIX vs. RYEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLXIX
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund
30.50%-8.56%45.26%15.34%27.02%42.04%-20.02%12.05%-18.48%-13.83%
RYEIX
Rydex Energy Fund
35.81%6.96%0.49%1.87%49.54%50.70%-34.24%6.50%-25.31%-6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MLXIX and RYEIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2014

0.83

The correlation between MLXIX and RYEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLXIX vs. RYEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLXIX
MLXIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MLXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MLXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

RYEIX
RYEIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RYEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RYEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLXIX vs. RYEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Rydex Energy Fund (RYEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLXIXRYEIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

2.81

-1.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

3.54

-1.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.45

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

5.63

-4.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.91

17.55

-14.64

MLXIX vs. RYEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the RYEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLXIX and RYEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLXIXRYEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.81

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.66

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.21

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.18

+0.03

Drawdowns

MLXIX vs. RYEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLXIX drawdown since its inception was -76.78%, smaller than the maximum RYEIX drawdown of -83.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLXIX and RYEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLXIXRYEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.78%

-83.50%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.44%

-9.74%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-26.94%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.14%

-26.94%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.63%

-74.93%

+2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

-2.86%

-3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.20%

-28.62%

+5.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.78%

3.12%

+4.66%

Volatility

MLXIX vs. RYEIX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Rydex Energy Fund (RYEIX) at 6.66%. This indicates that MLXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLXIXRYEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

6.66%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.05%

14.99%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

19.58%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

26.46%

-3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.16%

31.83%

-3.67%

MLXIX vs. RYEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLXIX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than RYEIX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLXIX vs. RYEIX - Dividend Comparison

MLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than RYEIX's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLXIX
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund
6.83%8.26%5.02%6.67%7.15%8.26%14.52%15.93%15.62%11.37%8.76%11.47%
RYEIX
Rydex Energy Fund
1.85%2.51%3.84%2.68%2.55%0.50%2.38%0.78%0.81%0.71%0.62%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLXIX and RYEIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLXIX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to RYEIX (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLXIX dropped -76.78% vs RYEIX's -83.50%.

RYEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLXIX and RYEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer