PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLXIX vs. OEPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLXIX vs. OEPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLXIX achieves a 30.50% return, which is significantly lower than OEPIX's 81.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MLXIX has outperformed OEPIX with an annualized return of 10.89%, while OEPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -20.53% annualized return.


MLXIX

1D
1.17%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
30.50%
6M
28.82%
1Y
19.89%
3Y*
24.52%
5Y*
19.89%
10Y*
10.89%

OEPIX

1D
3.49%
1M
-6.31%
YTD
81.75%
6M
68.33%
1Y
159.80%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
-20.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLXIX vs. OEPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLXIX
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund
30.50%-8.56%45.26%15.34%27.02%42.04%-20.02%12.05%-18.48%-13.83%
OEPIX
Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund
81.75%-1.85%-15.41%-3.76%88.50%14.90%-91.88%-4.45%-58.58%-22.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MLXIX and OEPIX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2014

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between MLXIX and OEPIX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLXIX vs. OEPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLXIX
MLXIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MLXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MLXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

OEPIX
OEPIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
OEPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
OEPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLXIX vs. OEPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLXIXOEPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

3.89

-2.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

3.97

-2.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.49

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

12.15

-10.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.91

32.28

-29.37

MLXIX vs. OEPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the OEPIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLXIX and OEPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLXIXOEPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

3.89

-2.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.21

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

-0.31

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.24

+0.45

Drawdowns

MLXIX vs. OEPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLXIX drawdown since its inception was -76.78%, smaller than the maximum OEPIX drawdown of -99.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLXIX and OEPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLXIXOEPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.78%

-99.30%

+22.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.44%

-14.61%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-65.50%

+43.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.14%

-65.50%

+43.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.63%

-97.79%

+25.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

-97.64%

+91.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.20%

-72.06%

+48.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.78%

5.49%

+2.29%

Volatility

MLXIX vs. OEPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) is 8.29%, while Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) has a volatility of 12.21%. This indicates that MLXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OEPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLXIXOEPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

12.21%

-3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.05%

30.54%

-14.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

45.72%

-25.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

56.76%

-34.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.16%

66.63%

-38.47%

MLXIX vs. OEPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLXIX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is lower than OEPIX's 1.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLXIX vs. OEPIX - Dividend Comparison

MLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than OEPIX's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLXIX
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund
6.83%8.26%5.02%6.67%7.15%8.26%14.52%15.93%15.62%11.37%8.76%11.47%
OEPIX
Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund
0.48%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%0.00%2.56%2.36%0.05%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLXIX and OEPIX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OEPIX has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to MLXIX (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLXIX dropped -76.78% vs OEPIX's -99.30%.

OEPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLXIX and OEPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer