MLXIX vs. GRHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX).
MLXIX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 21, 2014. GRHIX is managed by Goehring & Rozencwajg. It was launched on Dec 29, 2016.
Performance
MLXIX vs. GRHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLXIX vs. GRHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 35.24% | -8.56% | 45.26% | 15.34% | 27.02% | 42.04% | -20.02% | 12.05% | -18.48% | -14.97% |
GRHIX Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund | 19.81% | 61.65% | -1.51% | 16.61% | 16.38% | 62.15% | -2.74% | 0.01% | -30.03% | -0.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLXIX achieves a 35.24% return, which is significantly higher than GRHIX's 19.81% return.
MLXIX
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 14.05%
- YTD
- 35.24%
- 6M
- 26.46%
- 1Y
- 21.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.68%
- 5Y*
- 25.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
GRHIX
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- 19.81%
- 6M
- 30.25%
- 1Y
- 88.42%
- 3Y*
- 30.35%
- 5Y*
- 26.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLXIX vs. GRHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLXIX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than GRHIX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLXIX vs. GRHIX — Risk / Return Rank
MLXIX
GRHIX
MLXIX vs. GRHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLXIX | GRHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 3.04 | -2.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 3.41 | -2.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.49 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 5.33 | -4.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 19.81 | -17.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLXIX | GRHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 3.04 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 0.92 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.40 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLXIX and GRHIX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLXIX vs. GRHIX - Dividend Comparison
MLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than GRHIX's 2.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.52% | 8.26% | 5.02% | 6.67% | 7.15% | 8.26% | 14.52% | 15.93% | 15.62% | 11.37% | 8.76% | 11.47% |
GRHIX Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund | 2.83% | 3.39% | 4.02% | 3.19% | 1.21% | 3.25% | 2.03% | 0.57% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MLXIX vs. GRHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLXIX drawdown since its inception was -76.78%, which is greater than GRHIX's maximum drawdown of -70.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLXIX and GRHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLXIX | GRHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.78% | -70.61% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | -16.09% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.14% | -31.47% | +9.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -5.24% | +3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.47% | -18.49% | -4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.33% | 4.33% | +4.00% |
Volatility
MLXIX vs. GRHIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) is 6.04%, while Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that MLXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLXIX | GRHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 7.94% | -1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.30% | 20.96% | -7.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 29.30% | -6.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 29.52% | -7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.33% | 29.67% | -1.34% |