MLXIX vs. FSENX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX).
MLXIX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 21, 2014. FSENX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 14, 1981.
Performance
MLXIX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLXIX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 35.24% | -8.56% | 45.26% | 15.34% | 27.02% | 42.04% | -20.02% | 12.05% | -18.48% | -13.83% |
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio | 39.52% | 10.56% | 4.26% | 0.94% | 62.98% | 55.31% | -32.51% | 9.90% | -24.94% | -2.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLXIX achieves a 35.24% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 39.52% return. Over the past 10 years, MLXIX has outperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 15.06%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.34% annualized return.
MLXIX
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 14.05%
- YTD
- 35.24%
- 6M
- 26.46%
- 1Y
- 21.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.68%
- 5Y*
- 25.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
FSENX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 39.52%
- 6M
- 41.43%
- 1Y
- 45.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 25.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLXIX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLXIX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLXIX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank
MLXIX
FSENX
MLXIX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLXIX | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.89 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 2.38 | -1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 2.38 | -1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 8.35 | -5.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLXIX | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.89 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 0.95 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.37 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.32 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLXIX and FSENX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLXIX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison
MLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than FSENX's 1.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.52% | 8.26% | 5.02% | 6.67% | 7.15% | 8.26% | 14.52% | 15.93% | 15.62% | 11.37% | 8.76% | 11.47% |
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio | 1.39% | 1.95% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.50% | 2.25% | 3.43% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 1.74% | 0.62% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
MLXIX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLXIX drawdown since its inception was -76.78%, roughly equal to the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLXIX and FSENX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLXIX | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.78% | -76.24% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | -19.96% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.14% | -28.02% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.63% | -72.11% | -0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -1.93% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.47% | -17.06% | -6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.33% | 5.69% | +2.64% |
Volatility
MLXIX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) at 5.04%. This indicates that MLXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLXIX | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 5.04% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.30% | 13.46% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 24.64% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 27.41% | -5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.33% | 30.99% | -2.66% |