MLXIX vs. EIXIX
MLXIX (Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund) and EIXIX (Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - MLXIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds, while EIXIX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 5 years, MLXIX returned 19.56%/yr vs -4.21%/yr for EIXIX. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLXIX charges 1.43%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for EIXIX.
Performance
MLXIX vs. EIXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLXIX achieves a 25.74% return, which is significantly higher than EIXIX's -5.26% return.
MLXIX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -8.48%
- YTD
- 25.74%
- 6M
- 27.15%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 21.35%
- 5Y*
- 19.56%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
EIXIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- -5.26%
- 6M
- -5.10%
- 1Y
- -11.91%
- 3Y*
- -5.03%
- 5Y*
- -4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
MLXIX vs. EIXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 25.74% | -8.56% | 45.26% | 15.34% | 27.02% | 42.04% | -20.02% | -0.79% |
EIXIX Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund | -5.26% | -8.86% | 0.88% | -2.09% | -6.82% | 4.55% | 6.18% | 15.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLXIX and EIXIX is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2019 | 0.00 |
The correlation between MLXIX and EIXIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLXIX vs. EIXIX — Risk / Return Rank
MLXIX
EIXIX
MLXIX vs. EIXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund (EIXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLXIX | EIXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.73 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | -0.88 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | -1.59 | +3.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLXIX vs. EIXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLXIX drawdown since its inception was -76.78%, which is greater than EIXIX's maximum drawdown of -21.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLXIX and EIXIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLXIX | EIXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.78% | -21.00% | -55.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.44% | -13.34% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -16.29% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.14% | -21.00% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -20.90% | +11.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.13% | -5.48% | -17.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | 7.36% | +0.57% |
Volatility
MLXIX vs. EIXIX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund (EIXIX) at 1.98%. This indicates that MLXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLXIX | EIXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 1.98% | +5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.43% | 4.83% | +11.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 6.75% | +13.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 4.39% | +18.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.14% | 4.70% | +23.44% |
MLXIX vs. EIXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLXIX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is lower than EIXIX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLXIX vs. EIXIX - Dividend Comparison
MLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than EIXIX's 5.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIXIX Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund | 5.10% | 7.24% | 9.31% | 8.57% | 6.68% | 7.11% | 5.65% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 7.09% | 8.26% | 5.02% | 6.67% | 7.15% | 8.26% | 14.52% | 15.93% | 15.62% | 11.37% | 8.76% | 11.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLXIX and EIXIX have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLXIX has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to EIXIX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLXIX dropped -76.78% vs EIXIX's -21.00%.
MLXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLXIX and EIXIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer