PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLXIX vs. CFRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLXIX vs. CFRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Catalyst/CIFC Floating Rate Income Fund (CFRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLXIX achieves a 30.50% return, which is significantly higher than CFRIX's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MLXIX has outperformed CFRIX with an annualized return of 10.89%, while CFRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return.


MLXIX

1D
1.17%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
30.50%
6M
28.82%
1Y
19.89%
3Y*
24.52%
5Y*
19.89%
10Y*
10.89%

CFRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.76%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
4.74%
10Y*
5.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLXIX vs. CFRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLXIX
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund
30.50%-8.56%45.26%15.34%27.02%42.04%-20.02%12.05%-18.48%-13.83%
CFRIX
Catalyst/CIFC Floating Rate Income Fund
0.93%6.28%7.98%11.65%-3.87%3.12%3.45%10.05%0.70%7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MLXIX and CFRIX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2014

0.20

The correlation between MLXIX and CFRIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLXIX vs. CFRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLXIX
MLXIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MLXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MLXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

CFRIX
CFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLXIX vs. CFRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and Catalyst/CIFC Floating Rate Income Fund (CFRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLXIXCFRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

2.07

-0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

4.10

-2.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.70

-0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.35

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.91

8.33

-5.42

MLXIX vs. CFRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the CFRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLXIX and CFRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLXIXCFRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.07

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

1.76

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

1.39

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

1.29

-1.08

Drawdowns

MLXIX vs. CFRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLXIX drawdown since its inception was -76.78%, which is greater than CFRIX's maximum drawdown of -19.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLXIX and CFRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLXIXCFRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.78%

-19.18%

-57.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.44%

-2.19%

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-2.55%

-19.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.14%

-6.62%

-15.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.63%

-19.18%

-53.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

0.00%

-6.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.20%

-1.24%

-21.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.78%

0.62%

+7.16%

Volatility

MLXIX vs. CFRIX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Catalyst/CIFC Floating Rate Income Fund (CFRIX) at 0.60%. This indicates that MLXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLXIXCFRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

0.60%

+7.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.05%

1.89%

+14.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

2.49%

+17.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

2.71%

+19.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.16%

3.80%

+24.36%

MLXIX vs. CFRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLXIX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than CFRIX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLXIX vs. CFRIX - Dividend Comparison

MLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than CFRIX's 6.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFRIX
Catalyst/CIFC Floating Rate Income Fund
6.70%6.83%7.32%7.13%3.79%2.44%4.06%5.50%4.26%4.50%5.69%6.27%
MLXIX
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund
6.83%8.26%5.02%6.67%7.15%8.26%14.52%15.93%15.62%11.37%8.76%11.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLXIX and CFRIX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLXIX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to CFRIX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLXIX dropped -76.78% vs CFRIX's -19.18%.

CFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLXIX and CFRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer