MLPS.L vs. IUES.L
MLPS.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF) and IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, from Invesco and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPS.L returned 7.33%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for IUES.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPS.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUES.L.
Performance
MLPS.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPS.L achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 30.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPS.L has underperformed IUES.L with an annualized return of 7.33%, while IUES.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.52% annualized return.
MLPS.L
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 19.52%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 16.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 17.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
IUES.L
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 30.93%
- 6M
- 30.27%
- 1Y
- 44.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
MLPS.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPS.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF | 19.52% | 2.44% | 22.62% | 19.38% | 31.92% | 36.78% | -31.20% | 7.20% | -14.89% | -8.69% |
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.93% | 9.82% | 3.87% | -0.63% | 63.84% | 51.95% | -33.35% | 8.81% | -18.12% | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPS.L and IUES.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015 | 0.72 |
The correlation between MLPS.L and IUES.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
MLPS.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MLPS.L
IUES.L
Energy
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
MLPS.L
IUES.L
Utilities
MLPS.L
IUES.L
-
Industrials
MLPS.L
IUES.L
-
Basic Materials
MLPS.L
-
IUES.L
-
Communication Services
MLPS.L
-
IUES.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
MLPS.L
-
IUES.L
-
Consumer Defensive
MLPS.L
-
IUES.L
-
Financial Services
MLPS.L
-
IUES.L
-
Healthcare
MLPS.L
-
IUES.L
-
Real Estate
MLPS.L
-
IUES.L
-
Technology
MLPS.L
-
IUES.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPS.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank
MLPS.L
IUES.L
MLPS.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPS.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.34 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 3.07 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 9.67 | -4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPS.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.04 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.76 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.33 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.31 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
MLPS.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPS.L drawdown since its inception was -82.23%, which is greater than IUES.L's maximum drawdown of -66.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPS.L and IUES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPS.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.23% | -66.78% | -15.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -14.49% | +6.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.67% | -20.90% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -27.98% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.70% | -66.78% | -8.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -7.11% | +4.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.26% | -14.21% | -14.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 4.61% | -1.34% |
Volatility
MLPS.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) is 5.27%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that MLPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPS.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 8.17% | -2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 18.58% | -7.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.14% | 21.87% | -7.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 26.72% | -6.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.54% | 28.50% | +0.04% |
MLPS.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IUES.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPS.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MLPS.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPS.L and IUES.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUES.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUES.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPS.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPS.L and 0.15% for IUES.L.
Find the right allocation for MLPS.L and IUES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer