MLPS.L vs. ENGY.L
MLPS.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF) and ENGY.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, from Invesco and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPS.L returned 7.33%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for ENGY.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPS.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ENGY.L.
Performance
MLPS.L vs. ENGY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MLPS.L is traded in USD, while ENGY.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENGY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPS.L achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly lower than ENGY.L's 34.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPS.L has underperformed ENGY.L with an annualized return of 7.33%, while ENGY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.
MLPS.L
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 19.52%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 16.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 17.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
ENGY.L
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -1.83%
- YTD
- 34.37%
- 6M
- 31.63%
- 1Y
- 56.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
MLPS.L vs. ENGY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPS.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF | 19.52% | 2.44% | 22.62% | 19.38% | 31.92% | 36.78% | -31.20% | 7.20% | -14.89% | -8.69% |
ENGY.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 34.37% | 29.76% | -10.93% | 11.02% | 30.44% | 26.98% | -25.47% | 10.18% | -5.86% | 18.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPS.L and ENGY.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2015 | 0.44 |
The correlation between MLPS.L and ENGY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MLPS.L vs. ENGY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MLPS.L
ENGY.L
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
MLPS.L
ENGY.L
Utilities
MLPS.L
ENGY.L
Industrials
MLPS.L
ENGY.L
Basic Materials
MLPS.L
-
ENGY.L
Communication Services
MLPS.L
-
ENGY.L
Consumer Cyclical
MLPS.L
-
ENGY.L
Consumer Defensive
MLPS.L
-
ENGY.L
Financial Services
MLPS.L
-
ENGY.L
Healthcare
MLPS.L
-
ENGY.L
Real Estate
MLPS.L
-
ENGY.L
Technology
MLPS.L
-
ENGY.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPS.L vs. ENGY.L — Risk / Return Rank
MLPS.L
ENGY.L
MLPS.L vs. ENGY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPS.L | ENGY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.43 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 5.58 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 18.21 | -13.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPS.L | ENGY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.52 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.79 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.54 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.43 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
MLPS.L vs. ENGY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPS.L drawdown since its inception was -82.23%, which is greater than ENGY.L's maximum drawdown of -61.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPS.L and ENGY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPS.L | ENGY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.23% | -61.34% | -20.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -10.12% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.67% | -24.38% | +6.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -24.41% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.70% | -61.34% | -14.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -5.03% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.26% | -12.71% | -15.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 3.11% | +0.16% |
Volatility
MLPS.L vs. ENGY.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) is 5.27%, while SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that MLPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPS.L | ENGY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 7.89% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 18.97% | -8.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.14% | 22.37% | -8.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 25.85% | -5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.54% | 30.93% | -2.39% |
MLPS.L vs. ENGY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ENGY.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPS.L vs. ENGY.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MLPS.L nor ENGY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPS.L and ENGY.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENGY.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENGY.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPS.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPS.L and 0.18% for ENGY.L.
Find the right allocation for MLPS.L and ENGY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer