MLPS.L vs. CWEU.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPS.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF) and CWEU.L (Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, from Invesco and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MLPS.L returned 19.21%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for CWEU.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPS.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CWEU.L.

Performance

MLPS.L vs. CWEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) and Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD (CWEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPS.L achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly lower than CWEU.L's 32.64% return.

MLPS.L

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 19.52%
• 6M: 16.56%
• 1Y: 16.47%
• 3Y*: 19.21%
• 5Y*: 17.43%
• 10Y*: 7.33%

CWEU.L

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 32.64%
• 6M: 32.29%
• 1Y: 57.59%
• 3Y*: 13.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPS.L vs. CWEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MLPS.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF	19.52%	2.44%	22.62%	19.38%	31.92%	2.11%
CWEU.L Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD	32.64%	26.39%	-20.71%	2.18%	45.18%	9.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPS.L and CWEU.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021	0.24

Over the past year, MLPS.L and CWEU.L have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

MLPS.L vs. CWEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MLPS.L	CWEU.L
Energy	96.7%	48.3%
Utilities	3.2%	6.8%
Industrials	0.2%	14.0%
Basic Materials	-	17.7%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	12.8%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

MLPS.L vs. CWEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPS.L

MLPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
MLPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
MLPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
MLPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MLPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MLPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

CWEU.L

CWEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
CWEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CWEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CWEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CWEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CWEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPS.L vs. CWEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) and Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD (CWEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPS.L	CWEU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	3.43	-2.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	4.65	-3.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.58	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	8.74	-6.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.03	28.69	-23.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPS.L vs. CWEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the CWEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPS.L and CWEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPS.L	CWEU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.16	3.43	-2.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	1.25	-1.10

Drawdowns

MLPS.L vs. CWEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPS.L drawdown since its inception was -82.23%, which is greater than CWEU.L's maximum drawdown of -29.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPS.L and CWEU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPS.L	CWEU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.23%	-29.78%	-52.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.45%	-6.56%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.67%	-27.62%	+9.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.66%	-0.54%	-2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.26%	-8.53%	-19.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	2.00%	+1.27%

Volatility

MLPS.L vs. CWEU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPS.L) is 5.27%, while Amundi MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF-C USD (CWEU.L) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that MLPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPS.L	CWEU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	5.94%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	12.73%	-1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.14%	16.73%	-2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.41%	35.75%	-15.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.54%	35.75%	-7.21%

MLPS.L vs. CWEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CWEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPS.L vs. CWEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MLPS.L nor CWEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPS.L and CWEU.L in my portfolio?

MLPS.L and CWEU.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MLPS.L or CWEU.L?

On fees, CWEU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPS.L or CWEU.L?

CWEU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPS.L.

What is the main difference between MLPS.L and CWEU.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPS.L and 0.25% for CWEU.L.