PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPP.L vs. RNRU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPP.L vs. RNRU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MLPP.L is traded in GBp, while RNRU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the RNRU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MLPP.L having a 19.02% return and RNRU.L slightly higher at 19.04%.


MLPP.L

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.89%
YTD
19.02%
6M
13.93%
1Y
16.92%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
18.55%
10Y*
3.95%

RNRU.L

1D
-2.01%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
19.04%
6M
18.21%
1Y
49.83%
3Y*
2.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPP.L vs. RNRU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MLPP.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
19.02%-4.63%24.36%13.33%47.48%-2.95%
RNRU.L
Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
19.04%24.83%-21.90%-19.50%-0.25%-2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPP.L and RNRU.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.21

The correlation between MLPP.L and RNRU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPP.L vs. RNRU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPP.L
MLPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MLPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

RNRU.L
RNRU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNRU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPP.L vs. RNRU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPP.LRNRU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.52

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

8.92

-7.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

29.05

-24.70

MLPP.L vs. RNRU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPP.L and RNRU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPP.LRNRU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

3.13

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.12

+0.12

Drawdowns

MLPP.L vs. RNRU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -84.51%, which is greater than RNRU.L's maximum drawdown of -53.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPP.L and RNRU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPP.LRNRU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.51%

-53.53%

-30.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-5.56%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.03%

-37.25%

+18.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.30%

-20.48%

+13.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.25%

-29.04%

-7.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

1.71%

+2.17%

Volatility

MLPP.L vs. RNRU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L) at 5.73%. This indicates that MLPP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNRU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPP.LRNRU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

5.73%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

11.94%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

15.86%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

18.35%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.00%

18.35%

+13.65%

MLPP.L vs. RNRU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MLPP.L and RNRU.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

MLPP.L vs. RNRU.L - Dividend Comparison

MLPP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, while RNRU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPP.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.55%8.28%7.99%8.81%7.86%8.40%6.01%0.13%0.13%0.11%0.10%0.15%
RNRU.L
Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPP.L and RNRU.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MLPP.L and RNRU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

MLPP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while RNRU.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPP.L and RNRU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer