MLPP.L vs. INRG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MLPP.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)) and INRG.L (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Energy Equities funds - MLPP.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while INRG.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPP.L returned 3.95%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for INRG.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPP.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INRG.L.

Performance

MLPP.L vs. INRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPP.L achieves a 19.02% return, which is significantly lower than INRG.L's 39.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPP.L has underperformed INRG.L with an annualized return of 3.95%, while INRG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.

MLPP.L

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 19.02%
• 6M: 13.93%
• 1Y: 16.92%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: 18.55%
• 10Y*: 3.95%

INRG.L

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: 8.39%
• YTD: 39.09%
• 6M: 35.51%
• 1Y: 82.63%
• 3Y*: 5.64%
• 5Y*: 2.72%
• 10Y*: 12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPP.L vs. INRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPP.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)	19.02%	-4.63%	24.36%	13.33%	47.48%	38.50%	-38.75%	-2.21%	-17.19%	-22.69%
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	39.09%	34.75%	-24.39%	-23.83%	5.52%	-23.71%	135.23%	39.22%	-2.66%	10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPP.L and INRG.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2013	0.28

The correlation between MLPP.L and INRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MLPP.L vs. INRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MLPP.L	INRG.L
Energy	96.7%	24.7%
Utilities	3.2%	33.7%
Industrials	0.2%	28.3%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	10.5%

Return for Risk

MLPP.L vs. INRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPP.L

MLPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
MLPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MLPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MLPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MLPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MLPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

INRG.L

INRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
INRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
INRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
INRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 87
INRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
INRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPP.L vs. INRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPP.L	INRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	3.42	-2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	4.38	-2.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.53	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	6.64	-4.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.35	19.87	-15.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPP.L vs. INRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the INRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPP.L and INRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPP.L	INRG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	3.42	-2.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	0.11	+0.89
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	0.50	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.00	0.02	-0.02

Drawdowns

MLPP.L vs. INRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -84.51%, roughly equal to the maximum INRG.L drawdown of -85.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPP.L and INRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPP.L	INRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.51%	-85.09%	+0.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-12.38%	+3.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.03%	-44.29%	+25.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.03%	-57.38%	+38.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.34%	-65.47%	-14.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.30%	-27.35%	+20.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.25%	-56.54%	+20.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.88%	4.15%	-0.27%

Volatility

MLPP.L vs. INRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) is 6.47%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INRG.L) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that MLPP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPP.L	INRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.47%	9.58%	-3.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.89%	17.61%	-4.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.25%	24.04%	-7.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.82%	24.80%	-3.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.00%	25.33%	+6.67%

MLPP.L vs. INRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPP.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than INRG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPP.L vs. INRG.L - Dividend Comparison

MLPP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than INRG.L's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INRG.L iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	1.09%	1.77%	1.58%	1.00%	0.62%	1.01%	0.61%	2.05%	3.68%	3.69%	3.65%	3.90%
MLPP.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)	7.55%	8.28%	7.99%	8.81%	7.86%	8.40%	6.01%	0.13%	0.13%	0.11%	0.10%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPP.L and INRG.L in my portfolio?

MLPP.L and INRG.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MLPP.L or INRG.L?

On fees, MLPP.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPP.L or INRG.L?

MLPP.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INRG.L.

What is the main difference between MLPP.L and INRG.L?

MLPP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while INRG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPP.L and 0.65% for INRG.L.