PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPP.L vs. ENGY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPP.L vs. ENGY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MLPP.L is traded in GBp, while ENGY.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENGY.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPP.L achieves a 20.48% return, which is significantly lower than ENGY.L's 26.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPP.L has underperformed ENGY.L with an annualized return of 6.73%, while ENGY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.


MLPP.L

1D
0.81%
1M
5.41%
6M
14.08%
YTD
20.48%
1Y
18.70%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
19.32%
10Y*
6.73%

ENGY.L

1D
0.43%
1M
0.47%
6M
24.06%
YTD
26.40%
1Y
38.25%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
20.07%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPP.L vs. ENGY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPP.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
20.48%-4.64%24.38%13.26%47.49%38.54%-33.64%3.91%-10.05%-16.89%
ENGY.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
26.40%20.09%-9.05%5.80%46.02%27.72%-27.49%2.88%1.25%9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPP.L and ENGY.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2014

0.56

The correlation between MLPP.L and ENGY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

MLPP.L vs. ENGY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPP.L
ENGY.L

Energy

96.6%
98.4%

Utilities

3.2%
0.0%

Industrials

0.2%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Communication Services

-

0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Technology

-

0.1%

Energy

MLPP.L
96.6%
ENGY.L
98.4%

Utilities

MLPP.L
3.2%
ENGY.L
0.0%

Industrials

MLPP.L
0.2%
ENGY.L
0.2%

Basic Materials

MLPP.L

-

ENGY.L
0.1%

Communication Services

MLPP.L

-

ENGY.L
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MLPP.L

-

ENGY.L
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

MLPP.L

-

ENGY.L
0.1%

Financial Services

MLPP.L

-

ENGY.L
0.2%

Healthcare

MLPP.L

-

ENGY.L
0.1%

Real Estate

MLPP.L

-

ENGY.L
0.0%

Technology

MLPP.L

-

ENGY.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPP.L vs. ENGY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPP.L
MLPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MLPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ENGY.L
ENGY.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ENGY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENGY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENGY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ENGY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENGY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPP.L vs. ENGY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPP.LENGY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.97

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.45

6.03

-1.58

MLPP.L vs. ENGY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the ENGY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPP.L and ENGY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPP.L vs. ENGY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -81.28%, which is greater than ENGY.L's maximum drawdown of -56.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPP.L and ENGY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPP.LENGY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.28%

-56.13%

-25.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-19.35%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.03%

-26.58%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.03%

-26.58%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.26%

-56.13%

-18.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-12.32%

+9.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.67%

-12.24%

-22.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

6.32%

-2.13%

Volatility

MLPP.L vs. ENGY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPP.L) is 3.94%, while SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that MLPP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPP.LENGY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

7.37%

-3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

20.15%

-7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.57%

23.17%

-6.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.63%

23.60%

-3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.54%

25.69%

+1.85%

MLPP.L vs. ENGY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPP.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ENGY.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPP.L vs. ENGY.L - Dividend Comparison

MLPP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, while ENGY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENGY.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPP.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.62%8.26%8.01%8.75%7.87%8.40%11.76%10.29%9.50%8.48%7.39%9.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPP.L and ENGY.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ENGY.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENGY.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPP.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPP.L and 0.18% for ENGY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPP.L and ENGY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer