MLPIX vs. HNMVX
MLPIX (ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund) and HNMVX (Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MLPIX returned 8.80%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for HNMVX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. MLPIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for HNMVX.
Performance
MLPIX vs. HNMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPIX achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly lower than HNMVX's 23.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPIX has underperformed HNMVX with an annualized return of 8.80%, while HNMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.
MLPIX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 20.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.53%
HNMVX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 16.17%
- YTD
- 23.70%
- 1Y
- 40.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MLPIX vs. HNMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund | 12.01% | 5.48% | 9.65% | 13.32% | -8.61% | 28.23% | 1.85% | 24.02% | -13.08% | 10.45% |
HNMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class | 23.70% | 16.06% | 12.22% | 16.52% | -5.58% | 30.06% | -3.70% | 23.06% | -17.76% | 12.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPIX and HNMVX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2016 | 0.96 |
The correlation between MLPIX and HNMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPIX vs. HNMVX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPIX
HNMVX
MLPIX vs. HNMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class (HNMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPIX | HNMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.54 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 5.71 | -3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 21.49 | -15.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPIX vs. HNMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPIX drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than HNMVX's maximum drawdown of -51.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPIX and HNMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPIX | HNMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -51.33% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -6.84% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.24% | -21.00% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.24% | -21.00% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.96% | -51.33% | +5.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -1.31% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -7.02% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 1.82% | +1.25% |
Volatility
MLPIX vs. HNMVX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class (HNMVX) at 2.94%. This indicates that MLPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HNMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPIX | HNMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 2.94% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 8.87% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.86% | 13.01% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 18.70% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.32% | 21.84% | -0.52% |
MLPIX vs. HNMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than HNMVX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPIX vs. HNMVX - Dividend Comparison
MLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than HNMVX's 7.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HNMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund Retirement Class | 7.09% | 8.77% | 5.87% | 7.28% | 8.35% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 3.21% | 8.52% | 3.91% | 3.11% |
MLPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.42% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.89% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 3.92% | 10.95% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, MLPIX and HNMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MLPIX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to HNMVX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPIX dropped -60.11% vs HNMVX's -51.33%.
HNMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPIX and HNMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer