PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPIX vs. ACMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPIX vs. ACMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund (ACMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPIX achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than ACMVX's 8.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MLPIX having a 9.09% annualized return and ACMVX not far ahead at 9.25%.


MLPIX

1D
0.13%
1M
3.11%
YTD
10.16%
6M
8.52%
1Y
19.25%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
9.09%

ACMVX

1D
0.13%
1M
1.00%
YTD
8.96%
6M
8.30%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
10.95%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPIX vs. ACMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund
10.16%5.48%9.65%13.32%-8.61%28.23%1.85%24.02%-13.08%10.45%
ACMVX
American Century Mid Cap Value Fund
8.96%8.77%8.50%6.18%-1.34%23.41%1.63%28.89%-12.63%11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPIX and ACMVX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2004

0.93

The correlation between MLPIX and ACMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPIX vs. ACMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPIX
MLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

ACMVX
ACMVX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ACMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ACMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPIX vs. ACMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund (ACMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPIXACMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.09

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

6.77

-0.33

MLPIX vs. ACMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the ACMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPIX and ACMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPIX vs. ACMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPIX drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than ACMVX's maximum drawdown of -51.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPIX and ACMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPIXACMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-51.19%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-8.49%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.24%

-14.57%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.24%

-17.46%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.96%

-39.24%

-6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-1.60%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-5.91%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.62%

+0.54%

Volatility

MLPIX vs. ACMVX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund (MLPIX) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to American Century Mid Cap Value Fund (ACMVX) at 3.19%. This indicates that MLPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPIXACMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

3.19%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

8.63%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

11.98%

+3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.44%

14.62%

+4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.41%

17.45%

+3.96%

MLPIX vs. ACMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than ACMVX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPIX vs. ACMVX - Dividend Comparison

MLPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than ACMVX's 13.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACMVX
American Century Mid Cap Value Fund
13.98%14.46%8.76%5.24%15.00%15.95%1.83%1.46%14.51%9.49%4.05%11.06%
MLPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Fund
0.43%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.89%0.22%0.40%3.92%10.95%0.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPIX and ACMVX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPIX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to ACMVX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPIX dropped -60.11% vs ACMVX's -51.19%.

ACMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPIX and ACMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer