PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLLIX vs. PRMYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLLIX vs. PRMYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) and Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLLIX achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly higher than PRMYX's 2.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MLLIX has outperformed PRMYX with an annualized return of 4.91%, while PRMYX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.21% annualized return.


MLLIX

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.08%
6M
2.51%
YTD
3.73%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
4.91%
ALL TIME*
5.08%

PRMYX

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.17%
6M
2.58%
YTD
2.35%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
3.21%
ALL TIME*
3.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MLLIX vs. PRMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLLIX
MFS Lifetime Income Fund
3.73%9.32%5.62%9.12%-11.99%6.63%10.06%13.91%-2.37%8.24%
PRMYX
Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund
2.35%8.38%6.31%9.82%-4.22%0.02%1.29%8.54%-5.19%5.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MLLIX and PRMYX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.81

The correlation between MLLIX and PRMYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLLIX vs. PRMYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLLIX
MLLIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MLLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MLLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

PRMYX
PRMYX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PRMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLLIX vs. PRMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) and Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLLIXPRMYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.77

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.83

7.13

+1.70

MLLIX vs. PRMYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the PRMYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLLIX and PRMYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLLIX vs. PRMYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLLIX drawdown since its inception was -17.32%, which is greater than PRMYX's maximum drawdown of -9.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLLIX and PRMYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLLIXPRMYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.32%

-9.74%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.86%

-3.50%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.93%

-7.35%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.08%

-9.24%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.08%

-9.74%

-6.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.57%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.14%

-1.68%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.87%

+0.01%

Volatility

MLLIX vs. PRMYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) is 1.11%, while Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that MLLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLLIXPRMYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

1.55%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

3.93%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.52%

4.87%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.95%

5.26%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.71%

4.51%

+1.20%

MLLIX vs. PRMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLLIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PRMYX's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MLLIX vs. PRMYX - Dividend Comparison

MLLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than PRMYX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLLIX
MFS Lifetime Income Fund
7.41%6.01%6.26%3.70%3.92%6.12%3.18%3.80%4.20%3.56%4.21%2.51%
PRMYX
Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund
3.41%3.30%3.15%3.62%7.46%2.47%2.17%2.97%1.73%0.55%1.53%3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLLIX and PRMYX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRMYX has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to MLLIX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLLIX dropped -17.32% vs PRMYX's -9.74%.

MLLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLLIX and PRMYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer