PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLAIX vs. CIVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLAIX vs. CIVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class I (MLAIX) and Causeway International Value Instl (CIVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MLAIX having a 5.94% return and CIVIX slightly higher at 6.21%. Over the past 10 years, MLAIX has outperformed CIVIX with an annualized return of 17.32%, while CIVIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.22% annualized return.


MLAIX

1D
0.41%
1M
6.40%
YTD
5.94%
6M
4.62%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
22.81%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
17.32%

CIVIX

1D
0.65%
1M
6.71%
YTD
6.21%
6M
11.22%
1Y
25.35%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLAIX vs. CIVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLAIX
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class I
5.94%14.60%29.26%43.32%-31.27%25.21%37.37%33.47%4.06%32.39%
CIVIX
Causeway International Value Instl
6.21%39.13%3.73%27.29%-6.77%9.12%5.41%20.11%-18.62%27.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MLAIX and CIVIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2005

0.62

The correlation between MLAIX and CIVIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLAIX vs. CIVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLAIX
MLAIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MLAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MLAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

CIVIX
CIVIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CIVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLAIX vs. CIVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class I (MLAIX) and Causeway International Value Instl (CIVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLAIXCIVIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.48

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

2.17

-0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.28

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.56

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.64

5.16

-2.51

MLAIX vs. CIVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the CIVIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLAIX and CIVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLAIXCIVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.48

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.66

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.53

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.41

+0.17

Drawdowns

MLAIX vs. CIVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLAIX drawdown since its inception was -48.73%, smaller than the maximum CIVIX drawdown of -60.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLAIX and CIVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLAIXCIVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.73%

-60.93%

+12.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.28%

-16.19%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-17.30%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.20%

-28.51%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.20%

-44.87%

+5.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-3.33%

+3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-10.99%

+2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

4.88%

+2.01%

Volatility

MLAIX vs. CIVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class I (MLAIX) is 3.66%, while Causeway International Value Instl (CIVIX) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that MLAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLAIXCIVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

5.71%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

14.34%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.41%

17.04%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.35%

18.18%

+4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.88%

19.43%

+4.45%

MLAIX vs. CIVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLAIX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CIVIX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLAIX vs. CIVIX - Dividend Comparison

MLAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.66%, more than CIVIX's 9.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIVIX
Causeway International Value Instl
9.15%9.72%9.25%3.61%1.78%1.82%1.37%4.63%3.55%1.83%1.96%1.95%
MLAIX
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class I
17.66%18.71%18.18%8.86%12.91%23.19%4.85%10.44%21.60%16.10%12.42%12.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLAIX and CIVIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIVIX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to MLAIX (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLAIX dropped -48.73% vs CIVIX's -60.93%.

CIVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLAIX and CIVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer