PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLAIX vs. AWYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLAIX vs. AWYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class I (MLAIX) and CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLAIX achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly higher than AWYIX's 1.56% return.


MLAIX

1D
-0.66%
1M
2.38%
YTD
5.33%
6M
3.97%
1Y
13.60%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
17.73%

AWYIX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
1.56%
6M
0.83%
1Y
8.73%
3Y*
12.80%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLAIX vs. AWYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MLAIX
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class I
5.33%14.60%29.26%43.32%-31.27%25.21%37.37%33.47%-3.86%
AWYIX
CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund
1.56%7.66%18.19%16.39%-15.59%29.51%12.75%35.07%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MLAIX and AWYIX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between MLAIX and AWYIX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLAIX vs. AWYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLAIX
MLAIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MLAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MLAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

AWYIX
AWYIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AWYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AWYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLAIX vs. AWYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class I (MLAIX) and CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLAIXAWYIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

1.12

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.18

4.16

-1.98

MLAIX vs. AWYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLAIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the AWYIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLAIX and AWYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLAIX vs. AWYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLAIX drawdown since its inception was -48.73%, which is greater than AWYIX's maximum drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLAIX and AWYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLAIXAWYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.73%

-35.79%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.28%

-8.35%

-11.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-18.72%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.20%

-19.82%

-19.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-1.50%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-5.00%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.93%

2.24%

+4.69%

Volatility

MLAIX vs. AWYIX - Volatility Comparison

NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class I (MLAIX) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX) at 3.17%. This indicates that MLAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLAIXAWYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

3.17%

+4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.12%

7.67%

+6.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.78%

10.18%

+7.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

14.45%

+8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.98%

17.84%

+6.14%

MLAIX vs. AWYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLAIX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than AWYIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLAIX vs. AWYIX - Dividend Comparison

MLAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.76%, more than AWYIX's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWYIX
CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund
2.15%1.74%5.77%1.80%3.23%6.35%6.87%3.82%6.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLAIX
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class I
17.76%18.71%18.18%8.86%12.91%23.19%4.85%10.44%21.60%16.10%12.42%12.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLAIX and AWYIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLAIX has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to AWYIX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLAIX dropped -48.73% vs AWYIX's -35.79%.

AWYIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLAIX and AWYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer