MKOR vs. RNWZ

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

MKOR (Matthews Korea Active ETF) and RNWZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MKOR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while RNWZ is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MKOR returned 180.86% vs 33.81% for RNWZ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MKOR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RNWZ.

Performance

MKOR vs. RNWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKOR achieves a 105.30% return, which is significantly higher than RNWZ's 14.86% return.

MKOR

• 1D: 5.43%
• 1M: 18.33%
• YTD: 105.30%
• 6M: 118.25%
• 1Y: 180.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RNWZ

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 14.86%
• 6M: 16.07%
• 1Y: 33.81%
• 3Y*: 10.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKOR vs. RNWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF	105.30%	70.33%	-15.76%	-2.52%
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF	14.86%	36.33%	-7.36%	-5.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MKOR and RNWZ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2023	0.38

MKOR vs. RNWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MKOR	RNWZ
Technology	51.7%	-
Industrials	15.0%	5.3%
Financial Services	9.6%	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	-
Communication Services	2.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	4.8%
Healthcare	1.4%	-
Energy	0.7%	3.9%
Utilities	0.6%	40.6%
Real Estate	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

MKOR vs. RNWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKOR

MKOR Risk / Return Rank: 96
MKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
MKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

RNWZ

RNWZ Risk / Return Rank: 76
RNWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
RNWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
RNWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
RNWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RNWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKOR vs. RNWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MKOR	RNWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.52	2.23	+2.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.40	3.03	+1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.39	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.83	4.80	+4.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	32.45	12.78	+19.66

MKOR vs. RNWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKOR Sharpe Ratio is 4.52, which is higher than the RNWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKOR and RNWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MKOR vs. RNWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKOR drawdown since its inception was -22.09%, smaller than the maximum RNWZ drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKOR and RNWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MKOR	RNWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.09%	-24.90%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.62%	-7.07%	-13.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.63%	+5.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-7.17%	+0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.60%	2.65%	+2.95%

Volatility

MKOR vs. RNWZ - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) has a higher volatility of 21.03% compared to TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) at 5.01%. This indicates that MKOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MKOR	RNWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.03%	5.01%	+16.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.01%	12.11%	+24.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.39%	15.24%	+25.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.54%	16.97%	+11.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.54%	16.97%	+11.57%

MKOR vs. RNWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MKOR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than RNWZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MKOR vs. RNWZ - Dividend Comparison

MKOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than RNWZ's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF	1.28%	2.62%	5.28%	0.00%	0.00%
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF	1.95%	2.12%	2.36%	3.87%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MKOR and RNWZ in my portfolio?

MKOR and RNWZ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MKOR or RNWZ?

MKOR has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to RNWZ (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MKOR dropped -22.09% vs RNWZ's -24.90%.

Which ETF is better, MKOR or RNWZ?

On 1-year performance, MKOR leads with 180.86% vs 33.81% for RNWZ. On fees, RNWZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RNWZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MKOR or RNWZ?

Over the 1-year period, MKOR has performed better with a 180.86% return vs 33.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MKOR or RNWZ?

RNWZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MKOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MKOR or RNWZ?

RNWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.28% for MKOR.

What is the main difference between MKOR and RNWZ?

MKOR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while RNWZ is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MKOR and 0.75% for RNWZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.