PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MKB.TO vs. HBB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MKB.TO vs. HBB.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

MKB.TO (Mackenzie Canadian Strategic Fixed Income ETF) and HBB.TO (Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF) are both Total Bond Market funds. MKB.TO is actively managed, while HBB.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MKB.TO returned 1.66%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for HBB.TO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

MKB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie Canadian Strategic Fixed Income ETF (MKB.TO) and Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKB.TO achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly higher than HBB.TO's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MKB.TO has outperformed HBB.TO with an annualized return of 1.66%, while HBB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.21% annualized return.

MKB.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.33%
6M
0.56%
YTD
1.45%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
4.44%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
1.66%

HBB.TO

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.51%
6M
0.42%
YTD
1.06%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
3.71%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
1.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MKB.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Strategic Fixed Income ETF		1.45%2.54%4.70%6.67%-11.07%-2.34%8.29%6.55%-1.13%2.87%
HBB.TO
Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF		1.06%1.84%3.96%5.76%-11.94%-2.35%8.33%5.81%1.19%1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MKB.TO and HBB.TO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2016

0.66

The correlation between MKB.TO and HBB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.88 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Mackenzie Canadian Strategic Fixed Income ETF

Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF

Often compared with HBB.TO:
HBB.TO vs. HSAV.TOHBB.TO vs. XAGG.TOHBB.TO vs. CHPS.TOHBB.TO vs. QQCL.TOHBB.TO vs. USCL.TOHBB.TO vs. HXS.TOHBB.TO vs. CASH.TO

Return for Risk

MKB.TO vs. HBB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MKB.TO
MKB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MKB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MKB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
HBB.TO
HBB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HBB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
HBB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Canadian Strategic Fixed Income ETF (MKB.TO) and Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MKB.TOHBB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.13
0.91

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.63
1.25

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.16

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

1.43

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.11

3.44

+0.67

MKB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the HBB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKB.TO and HBB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MKB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKB.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.78%, which is greater than HBB.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKB.TO and HBB.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MKB.TOHBB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.78%

-18.23%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-2.78%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.67%

-5.16%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.05%

-16.19%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.78%

-18.23%

-1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-3.37%

+1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-4.57%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.15%

0.00%

Volatility

MKB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie Canadian Strategic Fixed Income ETF (MKB.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) at 1.20%. This indicates that MKB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MKB.TOHBB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

1.20%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

3.45%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.23%

4.43%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

6.55%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.96%

7.09%

+4.87%

Dividends

MKB.TO vs. HBB.TO - Dividend Comparison

MKB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, while HBB.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HBB.TO
Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MKB.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Strategic Fixed Income ETF		3.50%3.75%3.45%2.98%2.86%2.16%2.11%2.44%3.02%2.19%1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

MKB.TO and HBB.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and Global X.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MKB.TO and HBB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer