PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIX.TO vs. HBAL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MIX.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO) and Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF (HBAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MIX.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MIX.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF
-1.88%25.24%
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
-1.33%15.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIX.TO achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly lower than HBAL.TO's -1.33% return.


MIX.TO

1D
2.22%
1M
-7.55%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
1.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBAL.TO

1D
0.94%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
-1.33%
6M
0.70%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
12.18%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MIX.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIX.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than HBAL.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MIX.TO vs. HBAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIX.TO

HBAL.TO
HBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIX.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO) and Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF (HBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MIX.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIX.TOHBAL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.07

0.68

+1.39

Correlation

The correlation between MIX.TO and HBAL.TO is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MIX.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

MIX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than HBAL.TO's 2.24% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
MIX.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF
1.26%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HBAL.TO
Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF
2.24%2.41%2.28%1.08%0.02%0.06%0.04%0.19%

Drawdowns

MIX.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIX.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.71%, smaller than the maximum HBAL.TO drawdown of -22.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIX.TO and HBAL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MIX.TOHBAL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-22.49%

+11.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.29%

-4.80%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-4.61%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

Volatility

MIX.TO vs. HBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MIX.TOHBAL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

9.58%

+2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.14%

10.46%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.14%

12.18%

-0.04%