PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIX.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MIX.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MIX.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MIX.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF
-1.88%25.24%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
0.66%22.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIX.TO achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 0.66% return.


MIX.TO

1D
2.22%
1M
-7.55%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
1.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XEQT.TO

1D
2.80%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
0.66%
6M
2.68%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MIX.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIX.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MIX.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIX.TO

XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIX.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MIX.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIX.TOXEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.07

0.85

+1.22

Correlation

The correlation between MIX.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MIX.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

MIX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than XEQT.TO's 1.66% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
MIX.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF
1.26%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.66%1.66%2.01%2.07%2.12%1.64%1.66%1.19%

Drawdowns

MIX.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIX.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.71%, smaller than the maximum XEQT.TO drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIX.TO and XEQT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MIX.TOXEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-29.74%

+19.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.29%

-5.08%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-4.20%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

Volatility

MIX.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MIX.TOXEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

15.98%

-3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.14%

13.03%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.14%

15.63%

-3.49%