MIX.TO vs. FEQT.NEO
MIX.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF) and FEQT.NEO (Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MIX.TO is passively managed, while FEQT.NEO is actively managed. Over the past year, MIX.TO returned 28.31% vs 24.74% for FEQT.NEO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MIX.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FEQT.NEO.
Performance
MIX.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIX.TO achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than FEQT.NEO's 10.30% return.
MIX.TO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEQT.NEO
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MIX.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MIX.TO Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF | 8.17% | 25.24% |
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund | 10.30% | 19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIX.TO and FEQT.NEO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.70 |
The correlation between MIX.TO and FEQT.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIX.TO vs. FEQT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
MIX.TO
FEQT.NEO
MIX.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIX.TO | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.42 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 2.99 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.08 | 12.96 | -1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIX.TO | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.26 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.53 | 1.77 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
MIX.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIX.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.71%, smaller than the maximum FEQT.NEO drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIX.TO and FEQT.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIX.TO | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -13.24% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -8.31% | -2.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -1.02% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -1.45% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 1.91% | +0.65% |
Volatility
MIX.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) have volatilities of 4.07% and 3.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIX.TO | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 3.89% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.51% | 8.88% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 11.01% | +1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 12.45% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 12.45% | +0.18% |
MIX.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIX.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FEQT.NEO's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIX.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Dividend Comparison
MIX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than FEQT.NEO's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund | 0.82% | 0.91% | 0.91% |
MIX.TO Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF | 1.57% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIX.TO and FEQT.NEO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MIX.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIX.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for MIX.TO and 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.
Find the right allocation for MIX.TO and FEQT.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer