MIVO.L vs. XUKX.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) and Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Income 1D (XUKX.L).

MIVO.L and XUKX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MIVO.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. XUKX.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on Jun 5, 2007. Both MIVO.L and XUKX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MIVO.L vs. XUKX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) and Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Income 1D (XUKX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MIVO.L vs. XUKX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MIVO.L Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS	5.51%	17.54%	6.50%	8.50%	-7.95%	13.43%	1.38%	16.36%	-3.04%	13.15%
XUKX.L Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Income 1D	5.99%	26.23%	9.25%	7.53%	4.92%	17.95%	-12.17%	17.87%	-8.83%	11.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIVO.L achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than XUKX.L's 5.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MIVO.L has underperformed XUKX.L with an annualized return of 7.84%, while XUKX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.34% annualized return.

MIVO.L

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 5.51%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 14.23%
• 3Y*: 10.70%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: 7.84%

XUKX.L

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 5.99%
• 6M: 12.26%
• 1Y: 25.25%
• 3Y*: 14.86%
• 5Y*: 13.06%
• 10Y*: 9.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIVO.L vs. XUKX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIVO.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than XUKX.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

MIVO.L

Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS

XUKX.L

Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Income 1D

Return for Risk

MIVO.L vs. XUKX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIVO.L

MIVO.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
MIVO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
MIVO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
MIVO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MIVO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 51

XUKX.L

XUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
XUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
XUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
XUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
XUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIVO.L vs. XUKX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) and Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Income 1D (XUKX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MIVO.L	XUKX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.86	-0.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	2.35	-0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.40	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	2.70	-1.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.05	10.53	-4.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MIVO.L vs. XUKX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the XUKX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIVO.L and XUKX.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MIVO.L	XUKX.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	1.86	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	1.02	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.62	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.33	+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between MIVO.L and XUKX.L is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MIVO.L vs. XUKX.L - Dividend Comparison

MIVO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUKX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MIVO.L Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XUKX.L Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Income 1D	2.82%	2.87%	4.85%	3.69%	7.07%	2.76%	5.90%	4.37%	4.79%	3.96%	2.89%	0.41%

Drawdowns

MIVO.L vs. XUKX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIVO.L drawdown since its inception was -24.30%, smaller than the maximum XUKX.L drawdown of -44.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIVO.L and XUKX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIVO.L	XUKX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.30%	-44.72%	+20.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.38%	-9.36%	+0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.54%	-13.13%	-4.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.30%	-34.03%	+9.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.79%	-3.92%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.60%	-7.04%	+3.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	2.40%	-0.14%

Volatility

MIVO.L vs. XUKX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) is 4.17%, while Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF Income 1D (XUKX.L) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that MIVO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUKX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIVO.L	XUKX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	5.24%	-1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.12%	8.68%	-1.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.03%	13.59%	-2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.96%	12.90%	-1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.26%	15.25%	-2.99%