PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MIVG.TO vs. XDGH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MIVG.TO vs. XDGH.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

MIVG.TO (Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF) and XDGH.TO (iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Global Equities funds. MIVG.TO is actively managed, while XDGH.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIVG.TO returned 8.69%/yr vs 8.97%/yr for XDGH.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MIVG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF (MIVG.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIVG.TO achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly lower than XDGH.TO's 10.14% return.

MIVG.TO

1D
0.52%
1M
2.75%
6M
1.92%
YTD
4.03%
1Y
9.96%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
—

XDGH.TO

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.09%
6M
6.61%
YTD
10.14%
1Y
19.60%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIVG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIVG.TO
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF		4.03%9.98%23.80%11.57%-8.98%12.79%11.20%17.97%-0.62%0.72%
XDGH.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		10.14%14.60%10.49%9.52%-1.31%15.69%-4.23%22.41%-8.05%1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MIVG.TO and XDGH.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2017

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XDGH.TO:
XDGH.TO vs. XDG.TOXDGH.TO vs. XHD.TOXDGH.TO vs. XEQT.TOXDGH.TO vs. XDUH.TOXDGH.TO vs. VFV.TOXDGH.TO vs. VIDY.TOXDGH.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

MIVG.TO vs. XDGH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MIVG.TO
MIVG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MIVG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIVG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIVG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MIVG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIVG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO
XDGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIVG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF (MIVG.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MIVG.TOXDGH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.73
2.01

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.14
3.01

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.36

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

3.09

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

9.14

-6.83

MIVG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIVG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIVG.TO and XDGH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIVG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIVG.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.69%, smaller than the maximum XDGH.TO drawdown of -34.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIVG.TO and XDGH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MIVG.TOXDGH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.69%

-34.91%

+12.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-6.38%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.16%

-11.96%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.88%

-16.06%

-2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-2.42%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-4.62%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

2.15%

+1.56%

Volatility

MIVG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF (MIVG.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO) at 3.74%. This indicates that MIVG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDGH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MIVG.TOXDGH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

3.74%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.50%

7.41%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

9.81%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.39%

14.45%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.42%

23.36%

-9.94%

Dividends

MIVG.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Dividend Comparison

MIVG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than XDGH.TO's 2.76% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIVG.TO
Mackenzie Ivy Global Equity ETF		0.63%0.66%0.54%1.17%1.11%0.59%0.86%1.18%0.91%0.04%
XDGH.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.76%2.81%3.04%3.41%3.20%3.13%3.35%2.92%3.40%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

MIVG.TO and XDGH.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIVG.TO and XDGH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer