PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MITT vs. NREF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MITT vs. NREF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) and NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. (NREF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MITT achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly lower than NREF's 13.03% return.


MITT

1D
0.76%
1M
5.03%
YTD
-3.68%
6M
-4.36%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
21.43%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
-6.83%

NREF

1D
1.85%
1M
0.42%
YTD
13.03%
6M
12.00%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MITT vs. NREF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MITT
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
-3.68%42.79%17.10%35.77%-41.03%24.12%-81.69%
NREF
NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc.
13.03%2.28%13.51%17.36%-8.90%27.81%-3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between MITT and NREF is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2020

0.37

The correlation between MITT and NREF shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MITT:

$252.00M

NREF:

$765.15M

EPS

MITT:

$1.09

NREF:

$2.26

PE Ratio

MITT:

7.29

NREF:

6.59

PS Ratio

MITT:

0.50

NREF:

4.39

PB Ratio

MITT:

0.78

NREF:

1.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

MITT:

$492.91M

NREF:

$155.54M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MITT:

$464.48M

NREF:

$132.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

MITT:

$457.33M

NREF:

$152.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MITT vs. NREF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MITT
MITT Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NREF
NREF Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NREF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NREF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NREF Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NREF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NREF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MITT vs. NREF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) and NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. (NREF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MITTNREFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.18

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

1.91

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.29

4.83

-2.54

MITT vs. NREF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MITT Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the NREF Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MITT and NREF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MITT vs. NREF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MITT drawdown since its inception was -91.49%, which is greater than NREF's maximum drawdown of -66.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MITT and NREF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MITTNREFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.49%

-66.09%

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.74%

-12.92%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.77%

-24.00%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.76%

-44.78%

-24.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.38%

-3.98%

-67.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.78%

-16.75%

-22.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.68%

5.10%

+3.58%

Volatility

MITT vs. NREF - Volatility Comparison

AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT) and NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. (NREF) have volatilities of 6.80% and 6.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MITTNREFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

6.62%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.25%

17.32%

+2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.82%

24.64%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.21%

33.29%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.65%

45.65%

+22.00%

Dividends

MITT vs. NREF - Dividend Comparison

MITT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.21%, less than NREF's 13.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MITT
AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.
11.21%9.98%11.28%11.34%15.25%7.90%1.02%12.32%12.40%10.52%11.10%17.72%
NREF
NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc.
13.45%14.20%12.75%17.40%12.59%9.87%8.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MITT vs. NREF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. and NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M20222023202420252026
130.09M
41.79M
(MITT) Total Revenue
(NREF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MITT vs. NREF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. and NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
92.9%
100.0%
Portfolio components
MITT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 120.82M and revenue of 130.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.9%.

NREF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.79M and revenue of 41.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

MITT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 103.79M and revenue of 130.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 79.8%.

NREF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. reported an operating income of 31.79M and revenue of 41.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 76.1%.

MITT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -3.56M and revenue of 130.09M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.

NREF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NexPoint Real Estate Finance, Inc. reported a net income of 20.27M and revenue of 41.79M, resulting in a net margin of 48.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MITT and NREF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MITT has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to NREF (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MITT dropped -91.49% vs NREF's -66.09%.

NREF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MITT and NREF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer